• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No EFI environment detected?

    Sounds like someone deleted the EFI partition maybe.

    Or the machine is so old it still has a BIOS.

      • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        UEFI first became common on new computers in 2011-2012, so I don’t a lot of 2014 computers were BIOS.

        I have a cheapo laptop from 2012 (one of last Gateways) and it’s a UEFI machine.

        At this point, I think 15 years ago is a more realistic estimate for the last legacy BIOS machines - my Win7 box with a 1st gen i5 is legacy BIOS.

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think (not 100% sure) that UEFI is a replacement for BIOS. All modern computers use UEFI.

        People still colloquially call it “BIOS” because it serves a similar purpose, but there is a technical difference.

        • ultranaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is correct, it’s been quite awhile now since UEFI became standard but almost everyone still calls it the BIOS. Although I’ve noticed the word firmware is starting to be used more as well.

          • Peffse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 day ago

            which is funny because firmware is a legacy term for what evolved into what is honestly software.

            You don’t need to socket any new chips nowadays.

            • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean, if what we’re using is pulled from a chipset on the motherboard whose storage space isn’t rewritable from the OS interface, wouldn’t that be called firmware? You are using a flash chip to boot after all.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You are in fact correct. UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) is the modernized version of the very very old BIOS (Basic Input/Output System).

          It brought a parade of improvements including the GPT (GUID [Global Unique Identifier] Parition Table) partition table replacing the old MBR (Master Boot Record) partition table.

      • Russ@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, though I think the exception is (some?) ARM based PCs don’t run UEFI, in which ARM in general doesn’t have a universal standard for booting which adds complexity to it. Perhaps that’s already changed though, I haven’t kept up too well in the ARM space.

        Not sure if maybe the Walmart self checkout terminals aren’t x86 machines, perhaps they’re ARM or another embedded type of system.

  • spits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    IDK where this is, but I repaired self checkouts in Oklahoma and Texas for years and they all had Windows. The regular registers looked like this when they booted. But going off the way the surrounding hardware is facing the same direction as the screen and what looks like a debit reader barely visible on the left and the printer on the right, it does look like a self checkout, just not one like I’ve ever seen.

    • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Open-source Mbrowser 52.2, packed with security features

      Does anyone know where to find this?

      EDIT: All I can find are the user agent strings which indicate that this might be some IBM product. Also, there’s rv:52.0 in the environment part, but IBM Mbrowser/60.5.1 in the engines part - so the actual version of the browser component might be 60.5.1 in this case, not 52.x. (There’s also a rv:60.0 with Mbrowser/60.9.0 - no IBM this time.)