I’ve been trying Lemmy for a little while and wasn’t sure how to feel about it.

Today, I wanted to start blocking the most high-censorship instances until I could find a fully zero-censorship instance and simply block all the ones with censorship. Filter bots, not people.

When I looked into it further, I found out there are no zero-censorship instances, because Lemmy relies on a broken “federation” system where each instance is supposed to be able to fetch posts from other instances, but it’s never been finished to reach a fully working state. Lemmy’s official docs say you can’t even do federation over Tor at all. This means it uses DNS, so it won’t actually allow Lemmy instances to fetch posts from each other freely, it just gets blocked instantly and easily, every time the authorities feel like blocking anything.

So you can only ever have the “average joe lemmy” and “average joe reddit” with everything approved by the authorities, and then “tor copies of lemmy” and “tor copies of reddit” where you have free speech but you can only reach other nerds.

People seem to think Lemmy is different because this weird censorship fetish is extremely popular and most of you are happy to see bans happen to certain people, not just bots, so a small Lemmy that censors certain people feels fundamentally different from a big reddit that censors more people. But it’s the exact same thing, it’s reddit.

When reddit was smaller, you could say basically anything you wanted there, they just wouldn’t let it reach the main audience. Then it got too big, and any tiny part of the audience you could reach would be too big, so they won’t let you talk at all.

Lemmy is now the small part of reddit where you can say whatever you want, separated from the main audience, until too much growth happens and you have to move again.

It’s not actually a solution to reddit. It’s not designed to be different, it’s designed to match the past today and then match reddit’s present tomorrow, while being part of a system that’s about the same in past, present, and future.

Last year, this year, and next year, you’re posting somewhere it won’t be seen by many people, and the system that charges people for ambulance rides is getting another year of ambulance ride revenue, facing no organized resistance. There’s no difference here.

Lemmy urgently needs federation between onion service instances and DNS addresses in order to actually do what most users seem to wish it would do: allow discussion outside what the corporate authorities allow, while outgrowing reddit & helping undo the damage social media has done to human communication.

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    If 99% of speech comes from people who are against free speech, I want to let 99% of people censor themselves by posting in censored communities while I stay in a free speech zone.~

    There are some instances that could be described as ‘free speech zones’. It’s just they’re usually heavily defederated and so you’ll have to find them.

    • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      “heavily defederated” - again, my core point in this whole thread has been that according to Lemmy’s docs, they can’t federate.

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Currently federation works now. You just don’t like how it works, and you’re paranoid that the authorities will intervene and dictate to Lemmy instances what they should do.

            • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              It doesn’t work for what many people wish it would do (and pretend it does), which is to create a decentralized discussion space controlled by the people and not restricted by the authorities

                • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Just because you are one of the people giving them authority doesn’t magically stop it from being authority. Authority isn’t a word for “others” that each person exempts self-related things from. Why the fuck do I have to keep explaining this and copying and pasting where I addressed it in my original post?

                  this weird censorship fetish is extremely popular and most of you are happy to see bans happen to certain people, not just bots, so a small Lemmy that censors certain people feels fundamentally different from a big reddit that censors more people.

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I am not a member of a government or regulatory body with powers of enforcement. I am just “some guy” here with opinions.

                    You considered that the admins of lemmy instances would implement rules regardless of what the audience thinks?