Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 1 day agoFlirting in the Forgotten Realmslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1236arrow-down1imageFlirting in the Forgotten Realmslemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 1 day agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
Want a Trek community not based on Lemmy.world? Check out !Risa@lemmy.dbzer0.com // Alt Link for Piefed
minus-squareArchpawn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 day agoI didn’t realize they did in Pathfinder. Neat.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 hours ago and you can’t use it to hold items Aw…
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoLooks like the followup ancestry feat is more applicable to this image. I do like the idea of it costing an ancestry feat to get though. Implies it’s a feature some nephilim have, but not the majority.
minus-squareArchpawn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 hours agoBut is that really worth two feats? It seems like such a niche use case.
minus-squareBartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoFor a PC? Probably not, though it is an ancestory feat and those tend to be fairly weak. For an NPC social rogue sent to annoy the players? Absolutely!
I didn’t realize they did in Pathfinder. Neat.
Aw…
Looks like the followup ancestry feat is more applicable to this image. I do like the idea of it costing an ancestry feat to get though. Implies it’s a feature some nephilim have, but not the majority.
But is that really worth two feats? It seems like such a niche use case.
For a PC? Probably not, though it is an ancestory feat and those tend to be fairly weak. For an NPC social rogue sent to annoy the players? Absolutely!