Depends on. If they’re a “Marxist-Leninist” (read: Stalinist), they would shoot the liberal and the anarchist, then try to negotiate with the fascist. It they’re an actual Marxist, they would shoot the fascist and the liberal, then try to negotiate with the anarchist.
What’s there to negotiate? Once the fascists and the liberals are out of the way the Marxists and Anarchists can start a stateless society based on mutual cooperation. It’s a win-win.
I guess the Marxist would keep the gun, but shoot the roof and the anarchist would shoot the roof to name a point?
Depends on. If they’re a “Marxist-Leninist” (read: Stalinist), they would shoot the liberal and the anarchist, then try to negotiate with the fascist. It they’re an actual Marxist, they would shoot the fascist and the liberal, then try to negotiate with the anarchist.
What’s there to negotiate? Once the fascists and the liberals are out of the way the Marxists and Anarchists can start a stateless society based on mutual cooperation. It’s a win-win.
Historically, Marxist-Leninists have shot more fascists than anyone else.
After they were forced to, before that they tried to negotiate with them.
Yeah, and before that they tried to negotiate with the liberals to team up against the fascists, but the liberals preferred the fascists.