misk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 13 days agoWhat If A.I. Doesn’t Get Much Better Than This?www.newyorker.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up136arrow-down1external-linkWhat If A.I. Doesn’t Get Much Better Than This?www.newyorker.commisk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.08.13-105813/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/open-questions/what-if-ai-doesnt-get-much-better-than-this
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agoThe fact bubbles grow only means that this partivular cycle’s downfall will be particularly harsh, given all of the factors I’ve already cited are lining up. That’s the point! The fact that it is a bubble only reinforces my point.
minus-squareRossphorus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·11 days agoBubbles are not an existential threat to society. We’ve had like four bubbles in the past 20 years.
The fact bubbles grow only means that this partivular cycle’s downfall will be particularly harsh, given all of the factors I’ve already cited are lining up.
That’s the point! The fact that it is a bubble only reinforces my point.
Bubbles are not an existential threat to society. We’ve had like four bubbles in the past 20 years.