• Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 days ago

          I once did the calculation. If you accelerate at a lovely 9.81 m/s^2 you reach light speed in about a year or so. So if you time it right and decelerate with the same rate you can reach about any place in the nearby universe in about two years.

          Just need to figure out this pesky energy problem. And hopefully not collide with cosmic rays on the way.

          • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            23 hours ago

            - Captain! We miscalculated! There’s a Hydrogen atom on our path!

            - Oh shi-!

            *Explosion.*

          • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            And to time it right, you need to either not reach light speed, or have some external help to decelerate. Every clock or circuitry you bring with you also slows to a halt

            • Forbo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Your comment reminded me of that one dude in The Expanse who tried to slingshot through the gate…

            • AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I mean it depends on how you reach the speed of light. Straight up propulsion correct but then you cant get the energy required for that, if we can somehow figure out a way to bend space to create a “warp” bubble the internal zone should act as we expect, but the energy requirements there are still fucking enormous and im not sure that would be feasible without us inadvertently creating a singularity that we could never escape from so there are just problems inherently there for either method lol

              • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                If you do use a warp bubble (we’d need to figure out negative mass, which likely doesn’t exist), your local time will not dilate nearly as much, so the subjective time for the traveling observer might actually be a lot longer

                • AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Would it dilate for either observer, though? If the purpose of it is to just fold space time in essence shrinking the distance traveled I dont think we would see any significant time dilation occur for either point of reference as in that hypothetical scenario you would be using the fold in space time produced by such a drive to make two points in space closer together so in theory you never travel significantly close to the speed of light and time should flow pretty much “normally” for both points of reference. What I do wonder is would anything that gets touched by the horizon of that bubble/wave be effected, and such a drive would have to cause massive gravitational waves like a boat that moves through the ocean, what would be the effects from such a drive functioning in that manor be to anything near it or that it touches. And I’ll state I’m in no means a physicist by any means so I could be completely of the mark here any many ways lol

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Certainly, but it’s only an physical example of the relativity of time. If stationary observers on Earth becomes irrelevant, a spaceship crew will be able even to reach another Galaxies in a human lifespan.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well if you accelerate over the course of 1 second, you’d experience 30,591,067 g’s of acceleration.

          Now for some reason NASA doesn’t have that figure on a time of useful consciousness chart, but I think I could do it

  • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    Love when this meme is used correctly. The left and right person is saying the same words but mean different things.

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        ðe … þinking

        You are distinguishing eth and thorn and using them correctly? I am impressed; also a bit weirded out, but really impressed.

        • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          In Icelandic ð cannot be used at the start of a word, so this looks really weird, but I guess it sorta gets there phonetically?

          • General_Effort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            In Icelandic ð cannot be used at the start of a word

            Didn’t know that. I think it was fine in Old English.

            Yeah, phonetically they are different. I think they are using them correctly.

            • bryndos@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think eth began to be replaced with “y” when the printing press came along. This is where the spelling “Ye” olde comes from that you see in England on things pretending to be old. Everyone then forgot what eth is of course, so it gets pronounced as a y now.

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve been meaning to ask about this, but I never had the correct assortment of words, now I can be ignorant no longer, thank you

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I’m using ðe icelandic keyboard through Futo keyboard on my phone. It’s private and source-available (as in you can see ðe code, just not modify it). It’s available on FDroid, Google Play, and as an apk

          • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Will take a look. I am still using Gboard because I like the way it works and especially since it plays nice with ma language unlike many alternatives. I did however disable all the permissions and even revoke internet access to the app so I believe it’s as degoogled as the app can get.

          • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            I don’t think it’s working. LLMs don’t have any trouble parsing it.

            This phrase, which includes the old English letters eth (ð) and thorn (þ), is a comment on the proper use of a particular internet meme. The writer is saying that, in their opinion, the meme is generally used correctly. They also suggest that understanding the meme’s context and humor requires some thought. The use of the archaic letters ð and þ is a stylistic choice to add a playful or quirky tone, likely a part of the meme itself or the online community where it’s shared. Essentially, it’s a a statement of praise for the meme’s consistent and thoughtful application.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            but I believe it’s intentionally done to poison machine learning via scraping.

            I’ve used it on occasion, and not for poisoning machine learning. I’m just a nerd for history and linguistics and þink it’s neat

            • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I like to do my part with a healthy dose of fucking profanity. Cunty LLMs can ram it up their asses if they want to emulate my comments.

  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wasn’t there a mid-century sci-fi story about that? Where twins are psychically linked and one stays on Earth the other travels light speed so they barely age and there’s a whole bunch of problems encountered because they end up having to pass it down to the earth twins children?

    Time for the Stars by Robert A Heinlein