• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Seems like amazing work! Looking forward to testing if this is a solution I might use instead of Google Photos!

    • SGG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Immich is generally regarded as the self hosted replacement for Google photos, personally I have been happy with nextcloud, it’s more basic for photos but still does the job for me.

        • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          My experience is that Immich is more stable than Nextcloud, despite being ‘pre-release’

          Nextcloud had bugs that corrupted data several times when I was using it, switched away from it awhile ago because of that. NC also feels slow even with all the tuning they recommend.

        • mat@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Gah, Nextcloud is missing all the features and is frankly unusable (mobile apps are slow, can’t make or view albums, and can’t “open with” links on Android at least). My family uses it and my biggest project right now is importing all our stuff to Immich when I finally get the NixOS server ready to replace Ubuntu.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nextcloud Memories is something to check out. It is a vast improvement on the default photo experience and saves moving all your stuff.

        • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I haven’t had any stability issues with immich and I’ve been running it for over a year. Nextcloud has always been pretty slow for me and I’ve not had that issue with immich.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            This. Next cloud was /so/ slow and bloaty for me when I tried it. I also got turned away by their lack of ambition with security that went through lemmy about a year ago. I don’t like that they were advertising an encryption feature and then not actually encrypting anything past the first folder level. The feature is fixed now I believe but I didn’t like the how nom-chalant that process went. Especially for a program that seems to want to be commercial.

            Maybe the slowness was fixed, I should look into it again but my main use case was file storage/backup and syncthing more than manages that with way less overhead

          • hikaru755@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The only slowness I’ve experienced so far is that the android app can get a bit sluggish when scrolling around in the middle of my timeline, or inside bigger albums. Everything else totally smooth though

            • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you have a lot of photos, does immich require they all be downloaded locally, or does it fetch them from the server as needed?

              • hikaru755@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It fetches them as needed, much like Google photos. Every photo in the timeline has a little icon on it telling you whether it’s on your device or only on the server. You can have Immich installed on several devices and see photos from all of them on any of them no problem

                • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  That’s great! It’s what’s been holding me back from other self hosted solutions, is that they seemed to want a full two-way sync. Maybe it’s time to make the switch!

                  • hikaru755@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    Go for it! Doesn’t even need that much investment as long as you’re familiar with self-hosting. Just install it and see how it goes with new photos, and you can still backfill your old photos later. There is a tool that even lets you migrate your entire Google photos account, including albums, favorites etc super easily from Google takeout

    • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been using it for over a year now. It’s been a great replacement for me. It scans faces, shows where pictures were taken on the map, has the “this date” thing. 0 regrets.