New rule against “certain kinds” of adult content accompanies removal of “incest” games.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Some of those games are fucking disgusting and don’t deserve to exist. I don’t think that’s a credit card company’s place to decide, however.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      These policies inevitably end up being weaponized against LGBTQ+ people. Some of the games (like you said) I’m not losing any sleep over because they shouldn’t exist. The main concern is when something like homosexuality is equated with pedophilia. Or furries and beastiality. That kind of bad faith policy making has happened before and is happening now.

      • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m an ambiguous degenerate. I’d love those. All the games I’ve seen are made by incels for incels. Just terrible plot and dialogue by the saddest people who’ve never met a woman.

    • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fuck Visa but I’m 99% sure it’s a law (or a reinterpretation/expansion of an existing law) making them do this, it just doesn’t make sense otherwise.