fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoUSA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USAmander.xyzimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up11.45Karrow-down149
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1imageUSA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USAmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·3 days agoI don’t see much difference between the Parmesan case and Apple sueing against a vaguely similiar looking logo.
minus-squareodelik@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWasn’t it the Beatles sueing Apple and not the other way around?
minus-squareRailcar8095@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·3 days agoHow so? You can have a cheese that’s a molecular perfect replica of a Parmesan and have no legal issues. You only have problems is you call it Parmesan without following the requirements. To be honest, it seems like the complete opposite issue.
minus-squarethespcicifcocean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days agoi thought the problem would be if they called it parmigiano reggiano, but calling it parmesan was okay
minus-squareRailcar8095@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agoNo, they aren’t.
I don’t see much difference between the Parmesan case and Apple sueing against a vaguely similiar looking logo.
Wasn’t it the Beatles sueing Apple and not the other way around?
How so? You can have a cheese that’s a molecular perfect replica of a Parmesan and have no legal issues. You only have problems is you call it Parmesan without following the requirements.
To be honest, it seems like the complete opposite issue.
i thought the problem would be if they called it parmigiano reggiano, but calling it parmesan was okay
Both are branding issues?
No, they aren’t.