• dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yeah, there definitely are some waved away elements that are basically magic. I’m just binging TNG now, but I saw the Lower Decks tribute to many-a transporter incidents.

    I mean if you can transport and not at the same time (the copy version), it is not hard to think that once that buffer is cleared on the one side, it’s game over man.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      it’s only a problem if you think the sole thing defining “you” is an intangible soul that for some reason wouldn’t just transfer between or get copied alongside instances of yourself

      the line of reasoning you talk about has always been so strange to me, you’d be talking to a person walking out of a transporter and insist they’re dead, as they look you in the eye and ask if that’s an insult

      • dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        I had a similar argument with a friend, and I think he won that time. It came out of left field and rephrases the whole thought experiment.

        Instead of me defending the argument, how would you interpret a clone incident? Would you get ‘the other feed’ as well? We have the sleep cycle where we don’t actively get input (even though our conciousness is present during dreams to a certain extent). So if a transporter clone incident rebuilds the person on the other side, but an original instant could go on experiencing a life that wouldn’t be if the transporter functioned correctly.

        Hopefully that took the soul out of your argument!