ikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 20 hours agosystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down136 cross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
arrow-up1178arrow-down1external-linksystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square69fedilink cross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
minus-squareMonkCanatella@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 hours agoWhat do you mean by modular though? I assume there’s serious coupling amongst systemd modules that make “modularity” just theoretical
minus-squareFizz@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 hours agoIts like 70 different files and not all are required. You can swap out parts of systemd like run a different init system.
minus-squareMonkCanatella@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoSure but I wouldn’t say something is modular just because some things are modules. LIke yeah you can swap out networkd, but how about journald?
minus-squareFizz@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoI would. There are a lot of modules only a few have hard systemd dependencies
What do you mean by modular though? I assume there’s serious coupling amongst systemd modules that make “modularity” just theoretical
Its like 70 different files and not all are required. You can swap out parts of systemd like run a different init system.
Sure but I wouldn’t say something is modular just because some things are modules. LIke yeah you can swap out networkd, but how about journald?
I would. There are a lot of modules only a few have hard systemd dependencies