• FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Not dietal calories.

    The calorie numbers we assign to food, measure how much energy our body extracts from them when eaten.

    In this context, plutonium is closer to 0

    If we instead want to measure the actual total physical energy content of materia, we would turn to E=mc^2, telling us that a gram of anything has about 20 million kcal, no matter if its plutonium or diet coke. which is a slightly less useful value on food labels :D

    • atomicorange@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Technically it measures how much you can heat up a known volume of water if you burn the food. We have no way of measuring how much of that energy released by combustion actually gets absorbed and translated to ATP in the body, but it’s the best estimation we have of the relative energy content of foods.

      There’s some carbohydrates, proteins, and fats that our bodies don’t seem to convert to energy (or only partially convert) but still technically contain “calories” because they’re combustible. Sugar alcohols, fiber, etc.

      Plutonium doesn’t combust, but it would heat up water in a calorimeter. Really the test method’s applicability kind of falls apart when you start testing undigestible materials.