yeah, yet, its a feature in i3

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

someone didn’t read the article ;p

What am I missing, hasn’t this been in i3 since like forever?

I dont understand that part. This has been a thing in i3 since forever

geologists could also tell you where the best rocks are.

FTFY

Why? It IS about my aesthetic preferences :)

I like when everywhere in a place is different and memorable.

If you like samey grids I have no reason not to respect that, but I wholeheartedly disagree.

so fucking much better!

If we put it like that, every other energy source on earth begins that way and adds at least one conversion step.

… except for fusion of course.

Solar cells, technically.

boiling water systems have a thermal efficiency of ~40% Solar cells are closer to 45% efficient

One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons

This is just plain false.

There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.

the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html

Yeah its about quantum systems interacting, not sentient beings watching.

still pretty mystical though in my book!

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

That is not infinity, its undefined.

This only works if you use a one sided limit.

you can but then it’s not “British spelling”

Wouldn’t that be somewhere along the lines of $1000 per person, if divided over every single person in the world?

Well, more along the lines of 10% of all the worlds money.

… very reasonable indeed 😜