• MTLion3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    362
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Daughter turning into something I don’t like? Buy out the thing she uses to try and regulate her. Very normal and healthy behavior

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      159
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He also blames a ridiculously exclusive school in Cali for the kids of ridiculouslu wealthy parents for her forming her own opinions about stuff. It’s the same as other conservatives claiming college brainwashes kids.

      Also, we can take the “full blown communist” part as seriously as any other time a billionaire says it. She could have said something like “maybe rich people should pay more tax” and get that label from them.

      • MTLion3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh for sure. Extreme statements like that always ring as “They’re not how I want them to be so I’m going to call them radical”.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We want you to be well-educated, smart, and be a critical thinker that can think fo…wait…no, stop…not like that. We want you to critically think…but also arrive at the same correct conclusions as us…wtf, are you doing?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t even pretend to want critical thinking…

          That was the big push behind “no child left behind”. A focus on rote memorization and following rules.

          Because funding was tied to scores, teachers had to focus on what was being tested. And since critical thinking wasn’t tested, it became the lowest priority.

          The “boots on the ground” conservatives may not be smart, but the ones at the top of the movement 100% understand what’s going on. And they’ve spent decades trying to increase their numbers.

      • Flag@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        He doesnt seem to understand where he himself stands politically, making it a safe bet he falls to properly identify where others are.

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      136
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-twitter-inc-technology-business-b0a0f7e64c4616780459f012d172b1c9

      One reason why Musk bought Twitter this week is because he had little choice. The world’s richest man spent months trying to back out of the $44 billion purchase agreement he originally signed in April. But the uncertainty was so disruptive to Twitter’s business that it sued him in the Delaware Court of Chancery to force the deal’s completion, and a judge gave a Friday deadline to complete the deal or face a November trial that Musk was likely to lose.

      This is all bullshit. Self-aggrandizing lies to give the appearance that this massive failure was all in the plan. The guy was trying to play games with stocks and got caught. He’s a dumbass with no idea how the business he didn’t want to own but was forced to buy in the end works. It’s not deeper than that.

      I’m sure his daughter hating him is very upsetting but it’s not why he set 40 billion dollars on fire.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        His daughter transitioning and being liberal drove him to the far right on Twitter, because he couldn’t accept it.

        Those people kept telling him he should buy it to “save” it.

        He started talking about it, and that’s where your article picks up.

        It wasn’t just a whim, he had reason to start talking about buying Twitter, then was forced to actually go through with it.

        He thinks he’s “saving” it because conservatives believe everyone thinks like them and are just scared to admit it, but his intentional actions are killing it.

        • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 year ago

          because conservatives believe everyone thinks like them and are just scared to admit it

          just need to preserve this line because its so spot on

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s actually science behind it.

            A brain scan can reveal a person’s political leaning with like 80% accuracy, and I can’t stress enough how crazy that number is, the remaining 20% usually just aren’t political or in the middle.

            It’s done by looking at the size/activity of the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex.

            A conservative will have more amygdala activity, which is our flight or fight response.

            A progressive will have a larger preferential cortex, the part that gives us logic and empathy.

            It’s always important to mention that this isn’t permanent, our brains are like muscles, use certain parts and they get more active and even physically larger (but obviously on a small scale).

            We know that because there’s been studies on London taxi drivers. Before training their brains are normal. But since they have to memorize every street in London, by the time they’re certified there’s a noticable difference in the part of the brain that handles navigation.

            So it’s not like theyre a lost cause.

            And why republican leaders are so hell vent on removing “liberal arts” from schools. The people leading aren’t idiots, they’re trying to make more conservatives

        • demlet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          That last point is really interesting. Conservatives and right-wingers can’t grasp that other people don’t think like they do. I remember during the January 6th insurrection how all the people doing it really seemed to believe they would be seen as heroes. It’s like they had no idea over half of the US didn’t agree with them.

        • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Why can’t I name them binary numbers or ‘techno’ and have them shut up?”

          “People are too woke”

      • MTLion3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why not both? Because you’re absolutely right that he got fucked on a bad gamble and then tried to save face, but I can also easily see him trying to buy stuff just to stick it to the left. (But in all reality again you’re probably pretty solely right lol)

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I question if he actually got fucked on a gamble or if he was just inept and all of his decisions were largely a whim rather than based on some true data and research.

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe a bit of an extreme comparison, but it reminds me of when Donald Trump, also in the US, actually got elected president there. I remember thinking he looked quite wan in those early news clips. Like he was shocked to have actually won, and was rapidly having to adjust his expectations of the future.

  • w2tpmf@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    216
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This “technology” community is quickly becoming just as bad as the one on reddit.

    The insane ravings and personal drama of a lunatic billionaire isn’t news about technology.

    Even news about Twitter itself isn’t technology news. Twitter is a business that sells services. They don’t make or contribute to any types of technology.

    The only thing that Twitter technology related is that their business operates on the internet. That’s it. Chewy.com or NYTimes.com is just as much “technology” as Twitter is.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t make or contribute to any types of technology.

      That part isn’t completely true. When they created the bootstrap framework it changed how many people built websites. They can and have contributed to technology. However, your point is valid that news about Twitter is business news.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is just the new Society Pages of the rich and famous (ie people whose job is managing your attention).

      Even my beloved Paris Marx, of the Tech Won’t Save Us podcast (recommended), can’t help themself from constantly crowing about Musk’s latest tort against humanity.

  • kitonthenet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is revisionist, that sequence of events was what caused him to start to play footsie with the idea of buying Twitter, the SEC saying that’s a big no-no is what made him actually make the offer to buy it and then he was forced by a court to finish the deal after a long legal battle to not buy it

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the part where Dorsey literally conned him by playing to his ego. Jack cashed out almost a billion in cash to himself even though Twitter was close to bankruptcy. It was brilliant.

      • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        What cracks me up the most is that Jack already had a Twitter clone in the works, ready to be released once Musk burns down the old plattform and people wish for Twitter but without Musk back.

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bluesky isn’t exactly a twitter clone, it’s what Jack wanted Twitter to pivot to, but the board of directors refused to play ball.

          So Jack spun up a separate entity and explicitly made it its own thing outside of twitter.

          • maaj@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bluesky is pretty dope, but the moment I see ads, I’m nuking my account.

            • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Genuine question: given that running a platform like that costs money, and that money must come from somewhere, what would you actually do if you were in charge of running it? You either take money from advertisers, or you charge users directly, and I’d hazard to guess that if you’d nuke your account upon seeing ads, you probably wouldn’t pay actual money to use it.

              So what do you do?

              • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not the person you were speaking to, but get nationalised or run on donations as a non-profit.

                But I do pay more than my share for most fediverse instances that I use (which reminds me, I use this one enough - should probably make my donation regular)

                • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Honestly, I would love to see a Wikipedia-style social media platform take off, but I really don’t know if the finances could work out. Wikipedia already struggles, and it’s obscenely useful. I don’t think nationalization is really feasible for social media - at least in an American context - because it would be subject to the government’s legal limitations on regulating free speech, which are extremely minimal. A federally run platform would not be able to remove literal unironic Nazism, which is probably going to be a bit of a turn-off to normal people.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re sure proving her wrong, right Elon? …Right?

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk’s PR work for free.

    Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone whose net worth is in the billions is evil, because pretty much the only feasible way to gather that much wealth is to be a psychopath.

    • londos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could be generous and say they are not evil, but the system that allows them to become billionaires in the first place is evil.

      But as soon as you say “Twitter made my daughter hate rich people, so to prove her wrong I bought it and ran it into the ground so people can’t exchange ideas there anymore”…yeah, you’re not making the case you think you are.

    • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong! You see, all billionaires worked really really hard to exploit others! It really is all about hard work!

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obvious pattern w/ Elon blaming his stupidity on everyone else except himself. The media really should stop giving this jackass narcissist attention.

  • Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mr Musk had initially rushed to embrace the news when Jenna, formally known as Xavier, transitioned at age 16.

    To me this suggests that he first thought it would seem hip and contrarian to support his trans daughter, then he realized that actually the people he considers hip and contrarian are all about hating on trans kids now, and so swiftly pivoted to doing that. (I don’t imagine he had any strong feelings about his daughter as a person either way - it’s not like he was around for her childhood changing diapers or whatever)

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy gets his life force from being talked about. If we ignore him completely and show his daughter the support he never gave her, it will ruin him.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Unless the woke mind virus, which is fundamentally anti-science, anti-merit, and anti-human in general, is stopped, civilisation will never become multi-planetary,” Mr Musk told Mr Isaacson.

    A meme representing Edgar Allan Poe in two panels. In the second panel, the words "what the fuck am I reading?" appear.

    “If you want to just be a niche player an iconic name, PayPal is a better name, But if you want to take over the world’s financial system it to be impossible to reliably websearch and talk about outside a very specific context, then X is the better name.”

    Fixed that for you.

    There’s a reason why people still call it Twitter, you know.

    He said in April: “Twitter could become what X.com should have been, and we can help save free speech in the process.”

    And a potato could become a bell pepper to save my gulasch. Sadly it won’t because reality doesn’t magically revolve around my belly button, and it wouldn’t even if I were rich. So instead I’m making some curry.

    Musk should learn to cook.

    Mr Musk suggested charging people to be verified to eliminate bots, bring in cash and help transform it into a payments platform - fulfilling his “original vision” for X.com

    Ignorance on the nature of his own platform. Even if you demanded a single cent out of it, saner people won’t put their credit card info there, simply because they want to reduce the amount of data that you can vulture out of them.

    In other words he flushed the baby alongside the dirty bathtub water.

    Mr Agrawal had tried to resign. // “But we beat him,” said Mr Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro.

    TIL Musk behaves like an internet shitposter.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And a potato could become a bell pepper to save my gulasch. Sadly it won’t because reality doesn’t magically revolve around my belly button …

      I love you.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I’m a transphobic dickhead who flirts with Nazis on Twitter but no no it must be the evil socialism that drove my daughter to hate me”