• ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not expensive, but it’s another expense that not everyone can drop immediately.

      For most it would be a choice of upgrading to a new drive or getting two games.

      • pixelscience@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty conscious of other people financial situations, but a 512GB SSD is 19.99 on amazon. That’s 1/3 the price of the game.

      • Naatan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure. And of course it remains to be seen whether Starfield is worth it, but it’s undeniable that a game of this magnitude isn’t a common occurrence. If they realize the game’s potential, then missing out on it because of a relatively inexpensive hardware upgrade seems like a shame.

        • sim_@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is a game like Starfield “missable” though? Games like this’ll realistically be accessible for years (decades?) to come (not even counting Bethesda’s love of rereleasing their latest hit a la Skyrim lol). They might miss out on the cultural discussion if the game’s a hit though, that’s definitely a trade-off of late adoption, like what I’m experiencing with BG3 lol.

          • Naatan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s fair. It might even be worth waiting a year so the community can fix all the bugs :p I know I’m too impulsive to wait that long though. Played through Cyberpunk at launch and loved it!

        • ram@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          a game of this magnitude isn’t a common occurrence.

          It kind of is though. We’ve already had at least 3 games of this magnitude drop this year alone.

          • Naatan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m guessing one of those is Baldurs Gate, but I’m struggling to think of two more. There’s been some decent games for sure but none other that I’d put on the same scale. Diablo 4 had the potential but squandered it imo.

            • ram@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              None are baldur’s gate. While I’m loving baldur’s gate, it’s far from a market disruptor. The three games I was thinking of were TOTK, Diablo 4, and FFXVI.

                • ram@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  To be clear, of the ones listed I only care about TOTK and BG3. I’m looking at “megaton games” by a general ascertainment of how relevant they are to the enthusiast gamers, and how much they sell. FFXVI came out and kinda did not great for an FF game so I’ll concede there. No idea about Diablo 4, I assume it was middling or “as expected”, while TOTK sold 18 million in its first 6 weeks; though I may largely be familiar with that due to being in proximity of Nintendo-related circles.

                  It really is subjective what measure we’re using though. BG3’s been amazing in relative terms to what would typically be expected of “DnD RPG” (maybe there’s a better term), and developers have been reacting to it far more than they would most other megaton games. TOTK’s no slouch on its own, impressing developers over its extremely impressive yet performent physics engine.

                  https://www.polygon.com/legend-zelda-tears-kingdom/23737921/tears-of-the-kingdom-bridge-physics-game-devs-explain

                  Anyways, not really interested in arguing my perspective though, since like you said this is extremely subjective, and honestly quite arbitrary.

                  • Naatan@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    All fair points. I wasn’t trying to argue, just to have a friendly discourse :) My calling it a “game of magnitude” is obviously very open to interpretation.

                    For what it’s worth what I was trying to say was that this game has the potential to be unlike any game before it, so it’d be a shame to miss out on it just to avoid a minor hardware upgrade. But that in itself is of course also subjective. Suffice to say I myself won’t be missing out… :p