fossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1992arrow-down114
arrow-up1978arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 years agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.