• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s how I view AI generated art. It can come up with some really cool mash ups. But you have to do the rest. Anyone just using what it outputs like that’s the end of the story isn’t ‘using it right’ in my opinion.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re obviously not an artist. And you managed to completely miss my point.

        • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, but my husband is and he’s been refining keywords and using all sorts of loras and all other types of jargon that I don’t recall because I’m not interested in doing it myself.

          And I didn’t miss your point, I just don’t agree with it.

          • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So what, are you the art version of a military wife? Just throwing "aCtuALly"s out into the void because your husband types words into a field?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, I expect stuff like stable diffusion will become a part of the toolkit actual artists use. The workflows with this stuff are already getting pretty intricate where people use control net for posing, and inpainting of specific details, and so on. I would liken it to doing photography. You can’t just give a camera to anybody and get good results, it takes a person with a skill and taste to produce an interesting image.