• 0 Posts
  • 116 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle

  • I think that, in order to have this be a projection of a square, the space between the interior right angles of the space from which it was projected would have to be not just curved, but also twisted, like a Möbius strip, such that a person “walking” the square and starting from the rightmost angle leftward would start walking as if they were on your screen (their head coming out away from the screen), but then they would need to have their perspective twist so that they are now walking on the “underside” of the figure (their head now pointing into your phone). This would allow them to perceive the two “external” turns as “internal” turns, as well. Then it just needs to untwist on the way back. We just can’t see the twisting, because the lines have no width.






  • Absolutely, but aerobic life is more able to harness efficient energy with the use of oxygen’s INSANE reactivity, and that change was only possible because the anaerobes turned 20+% of the atmosphere into the elemental molecular form of the second-most electronegative element in the universe. Even plants, which produce oxygen gas during photosynthesis, use oxygen to power ATP synthesis. Oxygenation of the planet was absolutely requisite to allow the evolution of eukaryotic multicellular life.






  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzC-c-changes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Though let us consider the ch-ch-ch-ch-changes that would actually be necessary for each of these to exercise real choice in the matter at hand:

    The Public: Die, because that is the only thing that doesn’t actively destroy the biosphere, because you have no actual meaningful control over anything

    Farmers: Change professions, likely losing everything (at which point they become “The Public”), because you can’t even control what seeds you buy (See: Agricorps), let alone anything else you do with the land, and it’s all a monopsony, anyway (See: Agricorps) so you can’t even choose who buys your crops or for how much you sell them.

    Government: Literally the only thing required here is to take a long view and invest in infrastructure that also has huge short-term benefits. Realistically, the actual reason is because the politicians get money from the corpocrats (See: Agricorps), and don’t want to not get money from the corpocrats.

    Agricorps: It is explicitly against their fiduciary duty to tank the value of long-term investment in their own business by making the planet uninhabitable. The only change required is to actually hold to fiduciary duty, rather than “number go up, STONKS”.

    Huh, it’s almost as if there are very specific problems that can be traced to a single, specific spiderman here… interesting.