I mean, if oat milk is going to make you less healthy, why are we concerned about the water usage if it’s still a better alternative to cows milk on both counts?
There’s no industrial water usage in sticks I find when out walking. That doesn’t mean I’m going to put them in my cereal (intentional hyperbole to make the point).
Just look out that oat is a carb. If you’re having oat milk with cereal then you’re having carb with carb.
This is another straw on the camels back to svrewing up your sugar levels and potentially giving you diabetes.
I’m no super healthy guy, but a friend of mine had this issue where they were on the high glucose side due to their diet, this was one of the things they needed to cut out.
Almond milk I think was the better alternative.
What worked best for me was fitting eating around my weekly routine.
I have a standard 5 days work, 2 days weekend.
In general, the weekend is for fun so I applied that to food as well.
The week is for healthy eating. No snacks, bed early to be well rested. The weekend is for blowing off steam and eating treat foods.
For me, this meant that I reduced my cravings as I wasn’t eating unhealthily all week. By the time the weekend rolls around now I don’t want that unhealthy food that much. Note. It’s taken a while to get to this point but my weight has now been consistently low for over 2 years.
I think the main thing is whatever you find that works for you, it has to become something you can sustain.
I think wit is hard over text. To you it’s obvious you’re joking, and that your joke is that this comment is ridiculous.
To others it can read as someone making a joke with little respect for the Original post.
Take the meth one for example, I can see you being downvoted for that if the original post was serious.
The UK one just sounds stupid though, but then again mods of a Lemmy instance are likely to be people that take things (like Reddit fucking their API) quite seriously. This means our population pool may be a little skewed towards the serious.
On the other hand, I’ve seen lots of humour here. Especially from the AI generated community with their, a’hem, themes.
For those as ignorant as me who don’t like clicking on sites they’re unfamiliar with: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
Only it isn’t anywhere near as simple as the scenario you’ve put across. But sure I guess if you want to just say ‘calling them out is the most correct thing’. I can agree with that.
The problem comes in when the child molesterer is your bosses best bud and there are no other jobs around. Your boss doesn’t want grief with his friend (this is wrong but out of your control) and you need to feed your own family.
Calling this guy out then risks your family starving to death.
If you can however say that this guy’s shoes are going to rip up your carpet so you don’t want him over then hey presto! Everyone knows the real reason you didn’t invite him and you get to feed your family.
It’s great to compare things to another situation to try and find the 'ideal", but in a world where there are many different parties at play it’s difficult to find a scenario which actually compares.
Hmm, so are you saying that sporting events should hold a trial to find Israel guilty of war crimes? Because unless I’ve missed something this is what they’d have to do to formally make this claim.
I don’t think a sport organisation can start making war crime claims, and rightfully so.
Personally I think they’ve done the best they can. We’re all very confident Israel are committing war crimes. We’re all very confident this is the real reason they’ve been banned. It’s good that sport organisations have an avenue to exclude these countries without causing major diplomatic issues.
5 mins build and test times Vs 1hr build times.
I know that can be achieved by setting a monolith up to be more segregated in design, but my experience so far is that that rarely happens.
Ms architecture forces the segregation, which helps keep me sane (: