They didnt grow to it. Nobody just gave a shit before, because it wasnt against all skin colors.

You can argue that you have capitalism if transactions are happening. Which means the word kind of looses it’s meaning because it’s so broad.

But people will often define it on how much market control the state displays.

You can then argue that China has market control on key aspects of important sectors. Which they do, but still with an approach, that they have private companies with government subsidies.

But most of all, the need for distance to the world capitalism is more a marketing thing. Unless they believe that capitalism is just a tool to achieve socialism, which also can be true.

AI girl/boyfriends are fucking addictions latching onto people vulnerbilities.

This ban is nothing but good, but no one thing will fix child birth rates, nor the reason for the addiction in the first place, I’ll agree with that.

“over addiction”

You just chose to read the headline and thought the main reason was child birth. Which is a very concerning fact for alot of societies.

Even if you have to, at least try a little and let it make something that looks non-AI.

They could give it to the world, but it will still be for “power”.

If this existed, alot of industries would die overnight, and alot of them are in the west, oil states in the middle east and Russia.

Fossil fuels would be almost redundant, as everything would start to run on electricity. (this will take some time ofc) China is also winning the EV race hard, so they will certinatly benefit big time.

China also invested alot of money and time in the third world, and that will all be new markets for them if this shift happens.

The dark horse in this would be the EU, as they are already shifting towards green power and EVs.

The wind power industry in Europe would be the biggest blow, and then ofc Norway would have alot of oil left. BUT Norway has invested heavily in that transition, so they might come out on the other side pretty great.

Haha what you on about. The EU have declined this over and over.

The reason it keeps coming up is because the EU is a democracy, where every member state can propose things.

Your critisism is towards the few politicians proposing this. Not the EU, who, so far, has been on our side.

Scary thing is he didnt really accomplish much with his sacrifies. NSA is much scarier today and things just goes on.

Who gets the money tho :)

Anyone still think the heavy AI investments are for anything other than surveillance?

Lets record everything CEOs and government officials do in their spare time, and lets see how long that lasts.

Hard agree.

That’s a little different, don’t you think?

Having your own side supply your enemy

Compared to:

Supporting an ally with weapons to defend their own country.

Who gives a shit, when US are the ones invading. They should fuck right off, just as Russia should fuck out of Ukraine.

It’s no different.

The legally have to because of the US Cloud Act.

Every single US company has a backdoor because of this.

Americas AI is survalliance. Chinas AI is production.

Call me new fashion, but bug testing is something I would want to skip any day, if AI could find JUST 20% of my problems. And then I will fix them.

They’ll never do that.

The data harvesting is worth more to them.

It came out that every single key and convo is available on WhatsApp’s servers, and they do access it internally. We ofc already suspected it, but now it’s confirmed.

It’s also a US company, which I think answers everything without needing more explanation.

To those who still doesnt know, look at US Cloud Act.

They are also legally required to hand over the data. Do you honestly believe they go against the orange dictator and NSA?