I know that people like to throw that term around but, oh you’re an ml user. Not gonna bother explaining the realities of that word.

Oh people care about Tesla, it’s now an important domestic manufacturer. X is more appearance of a giant media or whatever you want to call it.

As funny as the thought is, they won’t remove the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and X.

You can’t be serious. Yeah you aren’t, so you pivot to trees.

Seriously?

implies

What is implied depends on the tone in which it is said.

From the GOP that “whether or not you vote is public record” in a sudden red text, and “your family friends and coworkers will know”, along with fucking binoculars carries a very sinister tone.

The Dems “Thank you!” and “Please vote” does not. The whether you vote is public record looks to me pretty matter of fact. Why it’s even said is a bit out of place, which is what I said was poorly worded.

This is not “both sides same” like the other guy suggested.

Saying “your vote is private” isn’t a threat.

Yeah I don’t think that’s a threat, poorly worded maybe. The Trump one was hinting at it (because plausible deniability is how they work).

Need to see it to see the tone. Saying “your vote is secret” can be taken a good way.

Really? I can only think this exists because they need space for a walkway.

The math checks out.

Detroit was a different meme.

They just have to pull themselves up by their bootstraps! See it worked for some!

Lemmy has a serious “I’m 14 and very badass” problem. Take the tone way down y’all. You wouldn’t act like this in the real world.

So was a wrong, most researchers go through MD/PhD programs? Like what percent of researchers go through medical school? 50/50?

So I’m curious. The way I see it, the actual practicing of medicine doesn’t advance the field itself. What advances it is research and development. Do the researchers actually go though med school or is that path more like biology PhD, chemistry PhD, etc?

Green usually means go.

Not violent enough for Shakespeare.

A long time ago they wanted a phone number for me to get a hair cut. She looked at me like I was crazy when I said no.

Any attempt to limit or ban data caps will draw strong opposition from FCC Republicans and Internet providers. Republican FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington last week argued that regulating data caps would be akin to mandating free coffee refills:

Suppose we were a different FCC, the Federal Coffee Commission, and rather than regulating the price of coffee (which we have vowed not to do), we instead implement a regulation whereby consumers are entitled to free refills on their coffees. What effects might follow? Well, I predict three things could happen: either cafés stop serving small coffees, or cafés charge a lot more for small coffees, or cafés charge a little more for all coffees.

You used to see a lot of bad analogies when people didn’t understand computers or the Internet. Are we still in that age? The Internet is a series of tubes?

“Hey mortals, welcome back.”