ideonek

What’s IE?

Man, this is a high-quality joke… why am I crying?

OK, let’s slow down for one secound.

1. if you re-designed it with complex multiplication problem instead od writtng tasks, and calculators instead of chat gpt - and change nothing else - you would get exactly the same result. If you reduce the challange to minimum, how do you expect brain to respond?
2. The “we have this not-reviewed singular study based on 50 people we should raise the alarm NOW” is every sensational.

There are so many problems with AI, and we need so many checks and balances. Sure. But let’s not change it into another “our pop-science vs their pop-science” kind of problem.

That’s a much better advice. Much worse joke though.

Compleatly understandable. Roll three d20… unfortunelty, your character died from sevear case of buzz kill. Go ahead an roll out n new one that is exactly like this one but more trusty toward people exactly like those in the party.

This is the part that resonated with me the most as the casual user. The interface is, so confusing that the differences between various forms of chats seems deliberately unclear. And all that’s “useful” is opt-in. And Groups - most used in corporate or project setting, can’t be encrypted at all? That’s… peculiar.

Again, thanks for the eye-opener.

No, I can’t stress enough how much I appreciate it. What I do right now is sending this article with TLDR to all my friends and family.

Any advice for people that used it in the past? After reading the article, my understanding is that what was sent in “private chat” was in fact encrypted (for the most part) and can be considered secured (to the degree - something is off and, maybe we didn’t find out yet, how the encryption is compromised). But it would wise to treat all other conversations as something that is compromised. Is this a fair summary?

Well, it was obvious to you. I’m a casual user, who tries to “do his best” and consider himself “somewhat informed” - obviously not by your standard. It was all news to me, and I find tremendous value in this article.

Is open-source washing really a thing? Any examples come to mind?

of course. it was a multipar series called “in the NO” or simply “No”. Here is the first part: https://radiolab.org/podcast/no-part-1

From what I observed the people who consider the concept of consent flawed and are discussing how it could be improved upon, so the safety and comfort of all people involved is protected seems, are the same people who fights for women’s right. There is a great RadioLab dive in on the topic - I honestly couldn’t recommend it enough). People who demands straight pride parades uses any edge cases of consent going wrong to weaponize it into “it happened, so the consent was there”. If you’re genuinely concern about safety and well-being of man, you’re putting your effort in a wrong place.

Sounds like a glass that’s half-full to me.