No, that’s a lie

Lego Island 2 was great

https://youtu.be/81fdKWOHrdE

R*tard

Well, I’m not going to have any interest in the game now.

My problem isn’t that animals died to make the game. That’s a bad thing, but my actions can’t affect it. They’re already dead. My problem is that this game is going to further extremes than any other game to deliberately include and glorify animal killing. I kinda forgive it in games like BOTW or Horizon because it’s part of the story, they’re just portraying life as it exists for some people. They’re not thinking about their actions. The dragon’s dogma people are. They are intimately aware of the fact they’re glorifying death, they took the time to think about it and said “that’s a good thing”.

Okay but that’s still not an algorithm and it still has nothing to do with where human consciousness comes from. Are you even paying attention?

So your argument is that consciousness in the human brain is explained by the fact ANNs are technically algorithms because they use Matrix multiplication?

I think we can class you as a non-reasoning organism who just says whatever pattern of words sounds right.

An LLM is like a human’s speech center severed from the rest of their brain, including the parts responsible for consciousness, reason, and memory. I think current level LLMs on the scale of ChatGPT are equivalent in intelligence to a chicken. Chickens are smart. They’re also really dumb. It’s a specialised intelligence. LLMs are basically animals, just specialised for something completely different than all extant biological animals.

Anyway, I think it’s worth having a conversation about limiting the use of ANNs on vegan grounds.

Autocomplete is usually an algorithm. LLMs are neural nets. There’s a fundamental technical distinction.

But that’s not relevant, because we’re not talking about the technical details of LLMs. We’re talking about the technical details of human consciousness. And unless you can fully explain where human consciousness comes from, this debate is not settled.

On Blahaj reports are the only way to express disapproval of content. So you could for example spread fascist dogwhistles about not liking politics, and if Ada doesn’t understand the dogwhistle then your content doesn’t get removed. That gives cryptofascists free reign

I’m glad the game about putting down a Jewish rebellion for equal rights was bad.

The Apple wall isn’t in line with the other walls. It has the perspective of one of those paintings that got Adolf kicked out of art school

Humans don’t eat chickens’ kids. They eat chickens’ period discharge

Yeah, screw Biden! We should let Trump win instead! That’ll help trans people!

…wait

🅱️inance 🫰🤌👌

The answer is pluralkit.

I need magic in order to feel like myself. I couldn’t keep being an atheist once I started using magic.

Not OP, but for me it was realising I was dronegender. I could either be an atheist whose identity was valid but not “real” as I conceived it, or I could embrace a religion that said my identity was achievable. That said mind melding with a swarm was possible and I could be who I am in a physical sense and not just a personal one.

Also I met a god. She’s nice.

Maxim Litvinov was responsible for opening those talks, and a year later, Stalin fired him for being Jewish and understandably anti-nazi.

Sounds like lesser-evilism to me. I don’t really have that much of a problem with you thinking all that if you can apply the same mindset to modern politics.