• 1 Post
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2023

help-circle





  • Git itself is not proprietary so all the projects can survive without GitHub if the need arises. Ad

    You’re neglecting the exclusion that’s inherent in Github when the need to bounce does NOT arise.

    Also worth adding that during the war in Gaza some of us boycott Israel. Which implies boycotting Microsoft.

    Additionally, you don’t need an account to view the repository or its discussions.

    Advocating read-only access is comparable to endorsing only freedom 1 and 2, not freedom 0 or 4. Which is precisely what I’m talking about: FOSS projects that discard digital rights and partake in digital exclusion for some convenience frills.

    There is of course a walled garden for participation and it is an issue, however it doesn’t compare to discord, which is much, much worse.

    Bug trackers have more of a monopoly on bug reports than discord has on discussions. There are countless decentralized discussions about free software all over the place – threadiverse, probably facebook, ad hoc phpbb forums, IRC, usenet, mastodon, mailing lists, conferences like FOSDEM … and rightfully so. Discussions don’t need the centralization that bug trackers do. General discussions also do not have the degree of importance to QA that bug tracking does.

    Case in point, when bugs are reported outside of Github, they don’t get noticed by developers and triaged.


  • There’s not really much point in using a self hosted gitea or codeberg or sourcehut if you want the barrier of entry to be as low as possible for potential contributors.

    Of course there is.

    But GitHub has more features (like discussions), provides better hosting and ease of use.

    Bingo. Prioritizing convenience features above digital rights principles is exactly why Github’s walled garden dominates over forges that have a lower barrier of entry.

    The focus of any open source project should be on development of the software, not the software which supports its development.

    Again, people to setting aside their principles is exactly what I’m talking about.



  • from the article:

    In short, using Discord for your free software/open source (FOSS) software project is a very bad idea. Free software matters — that’s why you’re writing it, after all. Using Discord partitions your community on either side of a walled garden, with one side that’s willing to use the proprietary Discord client, and one side that isn’t. It sets up users who are passionate about free software — i.e. your most passionate contributors or potential contributors — as second-class citizens.

    Interesting to do a “s/Discord/Github/” replace on the above. Same situation yet hardly anyone gives a shit.

    So yes, Drew DeVault is right. But he overestimates people’s commitment to free world digital rights principles and consistency thereof.


  • it would be more usable if the left column were locked so you don’t lose it when scrolling horizontally. Same for the top row.

    “Email / Phone required for signup” ← these are on two very different levels of intrusiveness… really needs to split into two rows. And from there, it’s interesting to know whether a phone must be a mobile phone or not. With email, it’s interesting to know if disposable addresses are blocked or not.

    Also, for “decentralized network” for #Signal, you simply have “no”. I would change that to “No (Amazon)” to inform people they are feeding Amazon by using Signal.

    In fact I suggest also adding a row: “feeds a tech giant” because privacy from tech giants is not the only factor – some of us trying to live ethically do not want to even feed privacy offending tech giants, such as:

    • Amazon
    • Microsoft
    • Google
    • Cloudflare
    • Apple
    • Facebook

    And as someone else pointed out, Delta Chat is missing.