

No, actually it’ll crash more, just to make sure everybody sees the fresh new design
No, actually it’ll crash more, just to make sure everybody sees the fresh new design
No. Most people just start littering when there’s no trash bins nearby.
The „merciless exploitation of the working class” is not how they get rich, but how they keep their wealth. If you’re poor, you can’t really exploit the working class. It’s basically just birth lottery with a really really small section for the people with luck and/or hard work.
Many things are wrong with me, I’m not ashamed to admit it. Tell me what do you think I did wrong, I’m open for suggestions.
I don’t know what you mean by this, but you probably misunderstood what I’m trying to say. I know of this tool, and I have been using it for years, but going into a random comment section and posting a link very vaguely related to the original conversation is a thing usually done by scammers, and doing this probably doesn’t help spreading the good word about your favourite project
Why are you promoting it like it’s one of those scam sites?
No, it’s when I click the thumbnail. It doesn’t show up in either the browser or youtube history.
Yes, but it does a refresh for some reason when you use it. And it also makes the thing more painful sometimes, because first the browser uses the cache, shows you the page as you left it, then it does a refresh before anything becomes clickable
Good for you, sometimes I only notice it after watching one or two videos on another tab, and then it’s really annoying
How does that stop you from being affected? It’s literally an <a> element
I have been using the one I use for 10 years, but the one you sent looks pretty good too. Being open source is a green flag for me too, when I started using mine there were no good open-source qr-readers, that’s why I went with this one.
I recommend using a dedicated qr scanner instead of google lens, because even if it can scan qr codes, it isn’t optimised for it. Sometimes it can’t even detect a medium-sized qr code in a screenshot, and it looks like they haven’t even implemented the full standard.
Here’s a pretty good qr-reader I can recommend: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.blogspot.aeioulabs.barcode
No, it’s just a good to have. I have made this art-piece as a demonstration (it’s a link to this post):
And here’s me reading it without a problem:
You said that „QR Codes won’t work without the white margin.”. I said that they don’t even need all of the code to work, and that they don’t need margins.
Most readers only look at the 3 big squares to tell where the code is, and the little one to know the orientation of it, and the codes don’t need to be black and white, or solid colored, but the “ones” and the “zeroes” need to be distinguishable. Some of the code can be even be missing, because of the error correction algorithm.
You probably downloaded some shitty addon, or installed firefox from the wrong source