His thoughts seem to be that they share almost no characteristics, no philosophical underpinnings, and that there seems to be no direct path from the one to the other.
What do you think a discussing of “proto-X” is going to look like, if not comparing it to other things looking for similarities and possible links?
What I meant was “do we know what Trumps final decisions look like, because all we get is waffling.”
But I can’t disagree with you either.
How would we be able to tell?
people don’t need a guide when using a chat bot that tells them how they should treat and interact with it.
Then why are people always surprised to find out that chat bots will make shit up to answer their questions?
People absolutely need a guide for using a chat bot, because people are idiots.
On this, I think we can agree.
The one does not flow directly from the other. A better world requires some protecting from each other, which means giving up some freedoms. A system of complete and total freedom would not be good for most people.
However, as Franken said, it is important not to give up essential freedoms. What freedoms, exactly, count as “essential” ones? Hard to say. We should have a thread to discuss it.
No, it isn’t.
What does that have to do with my claim?
I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but a lot of the trouble in the US was caused by people using their freedom to do terrible things to people, and to set the stage for more of the same.
Provided they don’t touch freedom to not breed, and we don’t put racist ducks in charge, I think that works be the easiest for me to bear.
But I don’t want kids, so it’s not much of a sacrifice.
Me, if you used restoring the Roman Republic.
Not on my browser they aren’t. They just started offering to make groups one day, and while I want to tear out someone’s tongue for it, it would require far too much effort, and might just be a bit of an overreaction.
Thank you for this. Now I know hire to turn them off.
Carefully trimmed sticker?
EDIT: Ah, I see you’ve handled it. Carry on, then.
Should be possible to just not plug them in.
But I have no idea why they are there in the first place.
I’m not suggesting that America before Trump was a paragon of virtue. But our corrupt leaders and wealthy oligarchs made America powerful to serve their own ends.
Trump is not serving the ends of American oligarchs. He’s serving the ends of Russian oligarchs.
It’s not a one-size fits all, that’s for sure. But I have no subscriptions to anything, and I wouldn’t describe anything I do with “work flow.”
it’s absolutely insane to conclude that Russia controls western governments.
Maybe not governments in general, but Trump and his party specifically, doesn’t seem too insane.
Don’t even have to do crime. You can usually email the author, and they will send you a copy, quite legitimately.
I’ve done it myself a few times.
In that order.
So you don’t want our opinions, do you? You just want people to agree with you.