Afraid people will use known vulnerabilities in common self-hosted software.

So every answer is as good as you can get?

I’m afraid of security bugs in the software I’m using, so that containers don’t contain, read-only doesn’t prevent writing, mounting directories doesn’t restrict access to those directories, etc.

I’m a nobody, I can’t imagine anyone targeting me or my random domain, but I can imagine getting swept up in a net of attacks of opportunities targeting hosted software with known vulnerabilities, or injected supply chain vulnerabilities, so I want to reduce my attack surface as much as I can (while still actually letting the people I want to access it actually access it)

I’m kinda disappointed with this thread, I’m in a similar position to OP, but all the responses are just like “use a reverse proxy and make your URL hard to guess” and other measures which are not very secure. \

It seems like that’s about as good as you can get at the moment, because the mobile apps barf if you try to add in auth in front of the reverse proxy, but a lot of people seem to be providing this advice like it’s good enough rather than as good as you can get.

Some reverse proxies have an authentication layer.
But this typically breaks the jellyfin Mobile app.

Idk if geo whitelisting is really good enough. I can’t speak for OP, but I’m in the same position and I don’t. I had high hopes for the post but everyone seems to just brush over the “secure” part

How do you get the mobile app to connect?

This would imply they’re surprised to see each other doing what they’re doing, which they absolutely aren’t

Obviously the second option.
How would he ever get dat ass into the pants? Be realistic, OP

I mean if they can track a car around the city using their cameras, they can probably do the same for a drone. Even if you fly up out of view they could look for drones in a radius flying down into view and connect the dots.

Fair

Possibly, but I don’t wanna risk my freedom on them being incompetent rather than corrupt.

Idk, I think they can probably do a reasonable job tracing a drone back to it’s takeoff location, and then tracking the person who brought it there back to their home, with decent coverage.

That said I don’t know if I’m overestimating their ability regarding machine learning and AI - this is probably fairly labour intensive unless they’ve don’t a good job preparing all their data and they have plenty of compute.

I mean the whole point of flock is that they can track you everywhere. Destroying their cameras doesn’t destroy the footage.

If you destroy their cameras they will just trace your movements backwards until they find a way to identify you.

You need to find a way to do it surreptitiously so it’s not clear who is doing it, and they won’t be able to figure it out by process of elimination by seeing who is commonly present when a camera iss destroyed.

Whomever made this hadn’t hit puberty by the early 2000s, because thongs were everywhere. They even made a song about it.

It’s not the cost.

The nicer shampoo is made by a company that supports the IDF

Yes the rest of the world needs to move around equipment and trailers. And they can do it without obscene trucks like this lol.

What makes America so incompetent that they need a truck like this to do it?

Bro your dick supposed to get drained, not do the draining.

The reply I made doesn’t depend on the definition of imperialism because the comment I was replying to wasn’t refuting that definition of imperialism.

I was pointing out that their argument boiled down to “yeah well that doesn’t count because the USA does it too”.

Idk why you’re trying so hard to be an asshole, but you’re putting words in my mouth and then insulting me about them.