• 0 Posts
  • 825 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月28日

help-circle



  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlMany such cases
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 天前

    To expand upon this, the reason I defend the use of this word within the context of using it to replace “stupid”, or other denigratory language targeted at intelligence, is because the majority of people alive today were raised with it not being an insult. I think it’s despicable to label people “ablest” when all they are likely doing is trying to call someone “stupid” - something that everyone seems to still agree is totally fine.

    This was a common, clinical term before 10-15 years ago. It’s wrong to use against neurodivergent individuals because it over-simplifies the many different different complexities that exist within the neurodivergent community. This said, the idea it is so horrible we can’t ever utter it again is absurd. If you go back into the roots and origins of other words, such as the n-word, there is no moral justification for it’s existence. This word, however, has a justification… a strong justification.

    Punishing people for using a word they don’t see as divisive is immoral, and in itself divisive.




  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlMany such cases
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 天前

    The thing is, having someone who is so intellectually disabled try to run our country is a really bad idea. And we can see all the pain and destruction this is causing.

    Trumps stupidity is very valid to insult for this reason. It is emphatically harming countless people across our nation.

    Stupid is as stupid does, and Trump does lots of stupid things.



  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlMany such cases
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 天前

    I agree. Furthermore, I see no difference between the “r word” and any other word that denigrates someone for their intelligence. That’s because there is effectively no difference other than a well monied campaign against that one, single word.

    I accept all of those words as valid as a result. I don’t conflate them with actual horrible words with actual history, such as the n word. I’m actually quite offended that people are suggesting these are equally offensive.

    People who are offended by this “r word” are idiots in my book. If the only thing that offends you about that last sentence is the “r word” bit, then you’re probably a hypocrite.

    Idiot, imbecile, stupid. These are all offensive if you yell them at a neurodivergent person. So, why is only one word not okay to ever say? Why must I censor myself here in this very conversation?

    The answer is money. Lots and lots of money went into a campaign against it. Also, virtue signaling. Lots of that, too. Have some moral integrity, stop this assault on semantics. It’s meant to divide people who would otherwise be united.