Except it’s literally not, the “content” in question is the title crackpipe - a crack is a modified binary/library permitting the execution of software without authorization, a pipe is terminology used to describe communication between programs on a surface level - yet you and others instead saw “black dude smoking crack”. So you’re discussing “actual content” which doesn’t exist anywhere but some misplaced idea.
So i guess the issue is complete inability to infer context?
Outraged nah, just annoyed at seeing the garbage start here too, let’s just stop and let’s focus on the content aight, no “what if’s” or “what coulds” if someone doesn’t outright come and state something then there’s nothing to discuss, just like we (or at least i) used to in the good 2000 before the quality of online communities went to shit (: