And yet you can’t actually argue against me. From one bullshitter to another, good effort(not really).

Damn, you’re just a whole heaping bag of word-vomit aren’t ya?

Well, just don’t get complacent. Cows kill a lot of people.

Idk how you think you cooked with this braindead comment, if we’re being honest with each other.

That ain’t healthy, chief. But I won’t judge. I sometimes drink Monster Energy like it’s water.

Balene whales. The ultimate lawful lifeform.

Geese can’t cause you bodily harm. Roosters will straight up kill you.

Haven’t spent much time with cattle huh. Idk if any animal fits the lawful big square.

How so? Elaborate.

That’s called being a bad cat owner.

Consent does not matter. To say it matters in this instance is insanely hypocritical. Unless you have that stance on literally every other aspect of our dominating other species for both our and their own benefit.

Statutory rape is a legal term for humans. It is not something that applies to other animals. Rape is rape. Since consent does not matter with animals, the best we can do is infer using context. Is the animal restrained in any way? Have they drugged the animal? What’s the relationship between the animal and person? Etc.

Just making sure this isn’t up for debate that coffee is better than nothing at all. 🙂‍↕️

And no water at all is worse than water from coffee. Do you know what a net positive is?

Coffee does count, btw. The amount of water used to make coffee counteracts the diuretic effect. This is pretty common knowledge.

From the grave. OOOoooooOoOo

I expected more tbh. The day is still young, though.

The point is consent is something that doesn’t matter to the conversation of people who do the deed with animals. I think a much more productive line of questioning would be: Is the animal restrained in any way? Have they drugged the animal? What’s the relationship between the animal and person?

Alright fine, I’ll block the whole fuckin community then.

Well, that’s an insta-block.

Aight, I know this comment is gonna bite me later, but I gotta speak my piece. I’m playing devil’s advocate here. Beastiality, zoophilia, whatever you wanna call it… It isn’t always a case of raping the animal. What is consent? It is ultimately an extremely arbitrary idea that humans fling around. For human-on-human interactions, obviously society has cemented it as something with clear-cut lines and rules. But, that’s pretty much where it ends for us. Consent from animals is not something we ever seriously consider in any way.

Think about it. Did domesticated species, which we have dominated for our benefit, consent? Do dogs consent to anything we put them through as our pets? Do cats? Birds? Bugs?! The answer is no. We cannot communicate with other animals. So we forgo consent when it comes to the animals we interact with. Even when it comes to things that really has no direct benefit to the animal.

All I’m saying is, rape is rape, for sure. But when it comes to inter-species erotica, as a man once called it, it can’t all be rape. Because animals rely on instinct more than anything, especially when it comes to sex. I guarantee a horse will show you when it doesn’t appreciate it being touched in the no-no spot.

Okey doke. Bring on the rain. 🙂‍↕️