“This is not an AI problem. It’s negligence on a 40-year-old standard—and it’s basically every sci-fi film ever,” says longtime security and compliance consultant Davi Ottenheimer. “‘Highly isolated’ and ‘escaped through the one hole we left open’ cannot both be true.”
Oh, yeah. None of my usual techniques would help get newer KDE on stable.
I guess there’s a chance it’s in back-ports, or will get there soon.
I can’t comment on Debian Testing.
I just run stable and pull cutting edge stuff from back-ports or flathub.
For some fancy stuff there’s usually a .deb file to download from the official site.
If I’m really desperate, there’s always piping a curl command to sudo, if I really really trust the provider.
I’ve daily droven Linux for ~3 years and learned a lot
I don’t have any thoughts on certs that haven’t already been shared, but some thoughts for any interviews you may land:
So be humble, but not too humble. Haha.
We’re a neat bubble here, but running Linux as a daily driver is still pretty rare, and puts you way ahead of the pack of other candidates, at least for entry/early Linux systems jobs.
Edit: And if you find an organization that uses AI spicy autocomplete to do entry level Linux admin work, run far away. There’s not enough money in the world to make it worth working with people that stupid (who choose to use hallucination for problems that demand reliability, haha).
Thank you for your wisdom, Comrade Shark Fucker.
Aegis works fine, as long as your organization allows standards compliant authenticators.
Yes. I also switched to Aegis.
Yeah. I just mention it because I’ve generally just used VNC myself; and wondered what the fuss with fancier tools was about.
But then I realized home Internet has getting worse for some folks, and so folks might be using a service to get VPN-ed together, or whatever.
I’m also a big VNC fan, but I imagine RustDesk is solving for CGNAT better? I’m not aware of anything in VNC that solves CGNAT being a PITA.
I think I just read “we’re spending big on AI because it maximizes our profits. Now we aren’t as cost competitive. Let’s talks about what else we can cut to save money.” before I stopped reading.
Let me take a wild guess: It’ll be about using AI to deny claims to recoup the money spent on AI…
Whether the article goes there or not, that’s the playbook.
Even while aware of how little classic scifi or fsntasy covers usually have in common with the book contents… This is still surprisingly weird.
Perhaps it’s just me, but to me this article feels like belittling the problem by not differentiating between “hated” products and “harmful” products.
Exactly!
Hated product? Oh well. My paycheck still cashes.
Harmful product? Oh shit. Sorry boss. I’m still working on that. It’s been confusing, but we almost got it. Annnyyyy day now, boss. Pretty sure we will get it on track next sprint. Or the one after. (Source: I once got well paid to “accidentally” kill at least one truly shit-head idea. It probably cost me a pay raise, but I left soon after for more money, and I’m still proud of that every time I reflect back on it.)
Do you need a specific game mechanic for that?
Not really, I suppose. But having it explicit can help players realize they have the option.
“Concede” is also handy for situations where a player feels that their character winning this particular battle would be out of character.
It’s a particularly helpful rule for cases where the player wants their character to do something particularly foolish, maybe to reach a specific story outcome, but still wants some influence on the final outcome.
It can go along the lines of:
Player: My character doesn’t have the brains to not start this fight, but even if we roll lucky and win this, it would feel broken. Can I roll an attack and then immediately concede?
GM: Sure. What would that look like?
Player: What if my character is disarmed somehow?
Etc.
I’ve seen where a few outcomes get discussed, and if the group doesn’t have a strong favorite, we just ranked them in order of luck, and then determined the full encounter with a quick single roll.
Why reference the imperfect copies gen AI makes when you have databases of the real original artists and pictures and 3d scans of real things in the world out there to reference.
I think it is because one of these approaches requires skill and time, the other requires a ChatGPT subscription and George Jetson to push one idiotic button.
It makes people feel that they can contribute in fields where they were previously (and still are) useless.
Pandora’s box is open and will never close again.
Yes…but this Pandora’s box just had a fart in it.
We know we can’t put the fart back in the box.
We just want people to stop acting like it is about to revolutionize modern cinema.
All it is going to do is clear the room.
Even if you get past the technical reasons of why this won’t work well, artistically, your avatar will clash with any game that’s not targeting these avatars.
You would think so, but my Mii fits in perfectly.
(Uh, hopefully it’s obvious that I’m bullshitting. I can’t believe how stupid Mii looked in various Nintendo games. It takes a special kind of leadership at Netflix not to have learned from Nintendo’s… experience.)
But they’re too late! I’m too entrenched in the Nintendo ecosystem, with my perfectly formed Mii that I demand to play as in a variety of games.
If only they had thought of this sooner!
Diced.
I was part of this adoption wave.
During the first hype wave, I felt nervous about their getting the game to a full release.
It’s a great game!
Examined as pokemon game, I rank Palworld somewhere a bit below Dragon Warrior Monsters II, but well above Pokemon Ruby (which itself is great).