

Sensible response is sensible


Sensible response is sensible


While I do expect a pop, I’m not so sure about this take; How does the bubble popping devalue what you already have?
In crypto you’re left holding the bag, having paid $100 for something now worth 1c.
If you’ve produced a bunch of work already and AI company goes out of business, how does that hurt you?


Semi-weekly.
Fortnightly.
But Firefox iOS has been doing this for like a year, no mention in the article.


I use Namecheap, I don’t know much about their privacy but they didn’t ask for photo id.
100% they were going to hit themselves
I thought that it was canon that China used brand new stealth tech to bomb the us back to the stone age.
deleted by creator
Yes.
Since the it wasn’t your manager that gave you the go ahead, you can’t use it as a shield. All you’ll do is make it seem like you’ll tell on people to get out of trouble.
And since telling on a coworker won’t get you out of trouble, don’t bother.
Say nothing.
HR is not on your side, they’re not looking for justice or fairness or anything.
Don’t rat on coworkers.
“I don’t recall.” Is a complete and very useful sentence.

Frierien; Beyond Journeys End
It’s about the mage from the Party of Heroes. 80 years ago they defeated the Demon King and shattered his armies, restoring peace to most of the world.
Frierien is an elf who has lived for hundreds of years and the rest of the party are dying of old age.
The show follows her as she learns to open up to people, even though she knows those people will only live for a small fraction of her lifespan, and what it’s like to live in the world she helped save now that people are starting to forget she did.
It knocked Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood off the top spot on MyAnimeList after (something like) 13 years of dominance.
It’s excellent, though some find it a little slow in parts. (I think that’s fitting for a story about an immortal)


Naw, dawg!
Using feature flags like this has been around for years.
Launch Darkly for example.
If they want to, yes.
Ban anyone for coercing someone into or out of clothing.
Granted, I haven’t put a major amount of thought into the nuance, but the idea of making it a sin for some people to legally go outside is absurd.
The approach of these laws makes it so the victims of mistreatment are the ones breaking the law.
It’s like making it illegal to be homeless or illegal to have been mugged. It’s fucking outlandish.
“I can’t go outside without wearing a head covering.”
“Head coverings are now illegal.”
“Now I can’t go outside.”
This makes the world more fair and equitable.
Here’s a wild idea, instead of making clothing illegal, why don’t we make coercing people into a manner of dress illegal?


I’m sure you already know this, but now you need to be SUPER deliberate about your food choices. You have a very limited ability to take in food, so that needs to be packed full of good stuff.
Good luck, we’re all counting on you.


It is of benefit to the company, I guess?
I think you have pegged me as a pro capitalist. Let me assure you to the contrary.


Market share and user metrics are also valuable.
But give no direct revenue, in fact for free customers they continue to cost the corp money.


100% seriously I don’t understand what this means.
Proton spend the money they made?


Sometimes that’s the case, but Proton have free tiers, so new customers can just cost more money on top of the cost to acquire them.
Buy 1GB of Ram