They don’t die anymore. Now they just “go back to their home planet”.

OP: Blue haired girl meme!! Lol!

Chat: “Ok boomer!”

This place is like a retirement home after 3 in the afternoon.

Yeah, as long as they deliver a message that is politically Democrat, then it belongs here.

Fun is no longer an option for this feed.

deleted by creator

Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?

Lol! Forbidden jer…the mall?!

I hate Paul as much as anyone. I REALLY do! But…

He is a pretty competent boxer.

Had to do a couple read throughs. Got a chuckle out of me tho!

deleted by creator

It’s more so that they can FEEL like they did the right thing. Not that they did the right thing.

It’s all about optics. If they vote for a Democrat and post a picture with their “I Voted” sticker, then they get internet points! Then they don’t have to be worried about getting canceled by their peers who they swear up and down don’t cancel people because that goes against their fake “live and let live” ideology.

Sure I voted for genocide, but I did it the way all of Hollywood did, so I’m cool and part of the club! It’s the acceptable form of genocide support!

Lol!

This fantasy you people have is nothing but sociopathy.

What “rich” are you trying to kill and eat? Just, anyone that you have judged to have more than you have? It’s not like you will be able to get to the people at the very top. And what, you just murder those that you have labeled “rich” along the way?

My brother makes more than I do. MUCH MORE. I would never want to see him and his family murdered by douche bags out of jealousy for the things he has been able to work hard to achieve. And he has worked hard all of his life to make it to where he is now!

Do you guys have some sort of test to see who should and shouldn’t be murdered just because they have more than you do?

You guys are fucking sick in the head!

Two eyes, two ears, a chin, a mouth, ten fingers, two nipples, a butt, two kneecaps, a penis. I have just described to you the Loch Ness Monster. And the reward for its capture? All the riches in Scotland!

It’s the same vibe.

This has been the behavior for decades!

Sure Kosovo, but at least he’s not the other guy!

Sure Yemen, but at least he’s not the other guy!

Sure Palestine, but at least he’s not the other guy!

And yes, Republican Presidents have made HUGE mistakes with their international policies, but I hear about them ALL THE TIME! And for good reason. They should be held accountable.

This sweeping under the rug because of “blue no matter who” mentality shares more similarity with right wing extremities than with normal people.

The bad boy of the competition:

Bart Harley Jarvis!

At this point (3 weeks before elections) if she comes out against the genocide, it’s obvious it’s just a career move and not her actual feelings. It will be business as usual afterward.

Apparently this is what her supporters want. As long as they can convince themselves to FEEL like she didn’t want to aid in genocide, that’s all that matters.

deleted by creator

My MIL is this kind of extrovert. She assumes that if someone isn’t constantly talking to her that they hate her.

Look lady: I love your daughter to death! I love you to death! I DON’T HAVE ANY NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN MY LIFE!! And you KNOW that!! Trust me, when I do, I WILL LET YOU KNOW!! In the meantime, business as usual and I don’t have any opinions on anything outside of my purview!

I swear, if ever she was forced to sit in front of a group of people in silence, her head might explode.

I find it important to call out any media bias no matter how “tepid” you may find it.

It’s the deluge of “tepid” examples of bias that makes us complacent when what you might consider “real bias” comes up and goes unnoticed and/or unquestioned.

To all of the “neutral” folks:

Wouldn’t “neutral” mean you could swap headlines and photos and still have the same emotional response (because that is the aim of propaganda, to illicit an emotional response)?

I don’t think this would garner the same response if it was switched.

It is subtle propaganda (apparently), but biased propaganda none the less.

Not necessarily. One snip gives an example of a positive quality of the person in question paired with a positive leaning photo. The other gives no such example of quality (and in fact uses authoritarian language as a way of swaying opinion) paired with a photo doctored to (at least in my mind) resemble historically negative figureheads.

This is a form of bias and propaganda.