RmDebArc_:tux:@toot.io to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 8 months ago#Firefox doesn't need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessibles3.toot.ioimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1332arrow-down136file-text
arrow-up1296arrow-down1image#Firefox doesn't need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessibles3.toot.ioRmDebArc_:tux:@toot.io to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 8 months agomessage-square71fedilinkfile-text
#Firefox doesn’t need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessible Theme: https://github.com/Godiesc/firefox-one #FirefoxCSS #browserwar #customization @firefox
minus-squareunrushed233@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoTell me more about that. How does it work?
minus-squareQuail4789@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoIts like userchrome but for the contents of the webpage. You match on the url and write css that overrides the site’s css.
minus-squareunrushed233@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoSo basically like a user style that you would use in Stylus? What are the differences, advantages/disadvantages?
minus-squareQuail4789@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agomy dude, this isn’t google
Tell me more about that. How does it work?
Its like userchrome but for the contents of the webpage. You match on the url and write css that overrides the site’s css.
So basically like a user style that you would use in Stylus? What are the differences, advantages/disadvantages?
my dude, this isn’t google