Despite its emphasis on protecting privacy, Mozilla is moving towards integrating ads, backed by new infrastructure from their acquisition of Anonym. They claim this will maintain a balance between user control and online ad economics, using privacy-preserving tech. However, this shift appears to contradict Mozilla’s earlier stance of protecting users from invasive advertising practices, and it signals a change in their priorities.

  • anachronist@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    What on earth would that do? The poisonous leadership would not use it to improve the browser nor would they start working for donors instead of Google.

    My point is that there is a funding model that they could have pursued when they still had goodwill and trust. And my hope is if the government finally puts the boot in with Google, then this current version of mozilla will collapse, the rats will leave the ship and hopefully a good browser will emerge the way firefox emerged from netscape.

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      But you just said

      Mozilla could have focused on being user-supported through fundraising like Wikipedia.

      It is an option.

      Clearly it isn’t working well enough for them.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        They would have had to build that infrastructure. I’m not saying fundraising is easy. But it’s possible as proven by wikipedia. They could have cut Google loose 10 years ago and said "we’re going to use our runway to try to put together a wikimedia foundation style fundraising operation. I don’t think they can do it now because the trust, goodwill and quite frankly, userbase is gone.