• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Damage done. It became a great example of why it isn’t a good idea to rely on an engine operated by a corporate entity, since there’s always a chance your product will be directly affected by some external executive’s random choice.

        • ridago@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          Docker Desktop now has a license cost for medium+ sized businesses. Docker Engine remains open source, but the desktop UI as well as the tech that makes Docker work on Windows (and Mac?) is now no longer free.

          • EvenOdds@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Rancher desktop on Windows has done well enough as a replacement for docker desktop for me

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thankfully containers are open source.
            Everything is “docker this” and “docker that”. But podman is viable, and there are other container systems.
            The container format is so ubiquitous it’s FOSS. I mean, it’s kubernetes.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I got personally screwed by this when I sunk the cash into Substance Painter / Designer, and then they “joined the Adobe family.”

      At this point any software in my pipeline that’s not FOSS would be considered a point of vulnerability.