• DeveloperKai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shouldn’t the 7800 be compared to the 4080? And shouldnt the 7700 be compared to the 4070? Am I misunderstanding something or are we comparing apples to oranges here?

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you think that? If they outperform their competitor model and are cheaper they should be compared, regardless of the marketing number not having the same digit.

      • DeveloperKai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm fair point, I suppose I’m thinking too “Red vs Green”, as opposed to practicality. I retract my earlier comment.

    • CataclysmZA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apples to oranges. The RTX 4080 competitor is the RX 7900 XTX. The RTX 4070 Ti competitor is the RX 7900XT.

      Logically the next thing to come out is the competitor to the RTX 4070, and a direct market replacement for the RX 6900 series and RX 6800XT. That should be the RX 7800.

      If anything, it’s NVIDIA that has confused everyone by hiking up prices and the naming scheme.