I’m planning to join but don’t want to join if I’ll see treads there

  • Cambionn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think ActivityPup isn’t even integrated into Threads yet? On release they said soon, a week later they said it was long-time planning. Haven’t heard about it since.

    • E. Chang 🏳️‍🌈@mstdn.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      @cambionn @Bicyclejohn They’ve gone from talking about ActivityPub support as a thing that is happening “soon,” to something that is “further down the road” and a “long term goal.” If they decide they can sustain the platform without it, I expect they’ll drop the feature.

      • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the one hand, great, I don’t want Meta anywhere near something I like. On the other hand, my friends are going to be on Threads, not Mastodon, so it’d be nice to follow them without having to go there.

      • ShadowAether@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They say they’ll do it but if they get a enough users without it then I think they might scrape that feature. I can’t imagine it integrates well with their existing code

  • cursedfroyo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one is currently federated with threads as threads does not support federation at this time. tech.lgbt is not proactively defederated from threads.

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Threads have even recently said that ActivityPub is a long way away from being implemented.