fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前Becoming et al.mander.xyzimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1714arrow-down16
arrow-up1708arrow-down1imageBecoming et al.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square34fedilink
minus-squareBatman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·1 年前Yeah I imagine they could have some sort of click to expand functionality
minus-squareMiles O'Brien@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 年前Literally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than “et Al” Uhhhhhh Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment. Carry on… please
minus-squarethevoidzero@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 年前That’s what bibliography is. It’s already like that, or am I missing something?
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前It sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors
minus-squareComment105@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 年前Then what’s the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits. Is the issue that it’s displayed in two places, so people don’t bother to check out the second?
Yeah I imagine they could have some sort of click to expand functionality
Literally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than “et Al”Uhhhhhh
Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment.
Carry on… please
That’s what bibliography is. It’s already like that, or am I missing something?
It sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors
Then what’s the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits.
Is the issue that it’s displayed in two places, so people don’t bother to check out the second?