He’s not actually, and if you read it, he warns that assigning meaning to meaninglessness is a fallacy. People feel bad because there’s no meaning but then that’s applying meaning to it. Transcendence of meaning frees you from it entirely and leads to Buddhism, which also embraced “emptiness” at the core of reality
He’s not actually, and if you read it, he warns that assigning meaning to meaninglessness is a fallacy. People feel bad because there’s no meaning but then that’s applying meaning to it. Transcendence of meaning frees you from it entirely and leads to Buddhism, which also embraced “emptiness” at the core of reality
Ubermensch schit
I think the problem is people mistake what Neitzsche’s ubermensch is. Happy Sisyphus is ubermensch Sisyphus.
Reading!?!?!?!?!?!? 🤮🤮🤮
ding ding!