roadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agoPenance (21/100)midwest.socialimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down10
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imagePenance (21/100)midwest.socialroadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoSo instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.
So instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.