roadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoPenance (21/100)midwest.socialimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1520arrow-down10
arrow-up1520arrow-down1imagePenance (21/100)midwest.socialroadsidewildflower@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.
So instead of ‘for’ you could use ‘because of’ and it would be almost perfect.