What? That shouldn’t be any basis for consent! Only if someone is able to consent, i.e. emphatically say ‘yes’ (or otherwise agree), should you start thinking about doing anything sexual involving them. If you do anything sexual involving someone who cannot say ‘no’ then that is a sexual violation of them.
Why are we sttill kink shaming?
Blahaj cannot speak, therefore Blahaj cannot give consent.
You don’t necessarily need speech for consent since non-verbal/mute people exist.
It can’t say no either /s
What? That shouldn’t be any basis for consent! Only if someone is able to consent, i.e. emphatically say ‘yes’ (or otherwise agree), should you start thinking about doing anything sexual involving them. If you do anything sexual involving someone who cannot say ‘no’ then that is a sexual violation of them.
This was a satire
Hard to spot and people might take it at face value.