Brdsnest Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

What's the worst invention of the 21st century?

message-square
message-square
184
fedilink
72
message-square

What's the worst invention of the 21st century?

UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
184
fedilink
  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    corporate personhood.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s pre-21st century though.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bad enough idea we don’t need anymore for the next few centuries.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        According to someone else in here, it was 19th, and that sounds right to me. I’m guessing early 19th.

        It’s just a neat, tidy legal fiction for some purposes.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it was 2010

        • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Negative. Corporate personhood predates Citizens United v. FCC (which is what I assume you’re referring to). IMO: The ruling itself still counts as an answer to the original question though!

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is that really a 21st century idea? I would have thought that was a reaganomics reform tbh

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        well citizens united was 21st and encoded it in law.

        • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Speak for yourself American

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I bet it effects you more negatively than decisions your country has mad unless your british or not a democracy.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a 19th century idea that appeared in the published decision of the Supreme Court in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.

        Only—get this—it wasn’t even what the Court decided. Instead, it was the guy in charge of recording the decision for publication who declared “corporate personhood” in the headnote (summary) of the case. And would it surprise you to learn that the guy was the former president of a railroad company? We just sort of went along with this not-precedent until the Citizens United case.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          yeah but citizens united codified it into us law.

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.41K users / day
  • 3.07K users / week
  • 6.59K users / month
  • 19.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 48.5K subscribers
  • 7.4K Posts
  • 360K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan@lemmy.ml
  • mekhos@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org