Televisions that can stream platforms like Hulu or Max usually come loaded with technology that collects information on what viewers are watching, and buyers consent to have their viewing tracked when they open their new TV and click through terms of service agreements. Sometimes, data firms can connect those viewing habits to a voter’s phone or laptop via their IP address, promising a trove of information about an individual and the ability to track them across screens.

Other times, firms focus on dividing households into groups based on what they’re watching, how they use their TVs and how many campaign ads they’re seeing, which is a boon to political campaigns eager to target specific groups of voters. Connecting this data to voter files is increasingly a focus — a move that adds individual voting habits into the mix.

  • CronyAkatsuki@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The more and more of stuff like this I see, the kore I just wan’t to buy the cheapest possible mini pc, make it tv remote controllable and just put it to open jellyfin directly that’s connected to my home media server.

    And then hook it up to the most dumb tv I can fijd with decent picture quality.

    • Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wish there were more high quality dumb TVs. Most of the dumb TVs I can find today are both very expensive and lack the features I’m looking for like HDR and 120hz+ frame rates.

      I know the argument is that the privacy invasions are subsidizing the cost of the TV but I have yet to see non-anecdotal evidence of that and suspect that the price of the TV would be the same either way because the market will only support so much expense.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just don’t let it connect to internet.

        There are no good dumb teevees for home use

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It will work at a premium cost, and only until they start selling them with LTE chips buried away in the motherboard.

          • LordCrom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            So many devices come with those now… I open up my products and remove the card, the antenna, or the whole board if possible.

              • LordCrom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                4 months ago

                For example, my sleep apnea machine had a wifi for home and a LTE modem. Data gathered by the machine was sent off-site…no reports available on the host. Privacy policy read it would gather info, run diagnostics on itself and the local network without explanation of what it was doing.

                My sleep data could not be viewed by me, only through the 3rd party, so I ripped out the wifi board and LTE chip. I haul the machine into my doctor office so he can cycle through data on the tiny display.

                He hates it, but I remind him he picked the machine without asking me if I agreed to to the data collection.

                • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Ya fuck that. That’s why I have an IOT vlan, though even that has its caveats. Nest speakers with microphones and your sleep apnea machine have some good personal data gathering capabilities despite it.

                • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  For insurance to cover it the data tells them whether you are using it or not. If you don’t meet the minimum usage they won’t pay for the machine. Buying it yourself negates that, but they can get spendy.

                  Do not buy Philips.

                  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    They make you buy the machine… The data is collected for doctor review, but instead of letting me use the open FOSS reporting, it’s encrypted so that I can’t see my own data.

                    After that experience I’m certain sleep apnea machines are a huge insurance racket. 45 dollars for a replacement plastic tube…lol

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s becoming harder to find TVs that will operate without a network connection

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah, I’ve seen it on some Samsungs and LGs that get real pissy when the TV itself isn’t online. I’ve also heard of some brands (that I don’t remember atm) that won’t even let you go through the initial setup without a connection.

              • pdxfed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                … I’ve also heard of some brands (that I don’t remember atm) that won’t even let you go through the initial setup without a connection.

                /Microsoft announced new foray into TVs…

      • Echo5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I grabbed a display TV and haven’t hooked it up to the internet, so far so good. Could look into that.

      • InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I use computer monitors for TVs. Mostly because they’re smaller and I don’t have that much space for stuff. Most have all those features but don’t have a smart interface. I plug them in over HDMI and make sure CEC is enabled so I can turn it on and off with a dumb remote the RasPi. Works pretty well actually.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m biased but I think everyone should do this. You can basically find the hardware you’d need out of a dumpster, and then you can slowly build your library from there.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        *Sceptre, not spectre.

        (I misspell it almost every time, too.)

        When my parents got a new TV, I made sure they bought a Sceptre. So far it’s working fine.

    • thayer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      As others have said, just buy a TV that meets your A/V needs and don’t connect it to the internet.

      I know everyone talks about Jellyfin these days, but Kodi is an excellent option too if you don’t need streaming to multiple devices. I use Kodi via LibreElec on an rpi4 and it’s been great. All media is stored on my home server and shared over Samba, but you can easily store it locally on the box if you don’t have a server.

      For music streaming, I run a separate instance of miniDLNA on my server, since I like to browse-by-directory for my music instead of relying solely on metadata. This also allows you to stream to any DLNA-friendly device on the LAN.

      I’ve digitized my disc collection and just keep the physical media as a backup. The local library has a huge selection of media too…and if we don’t use it, we’ll lose it.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Jellyfin has a much nicer user interface and is overall a better way of doing things. But libreElec and Kodi are great at being a cheap open source client that handles lots of different codecs without much fuss.

        • thayer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I have a JF instance running on Proxmox as well, but it hasn’t won me over yet. Still, I know a lot of folks do prefer it to Kodi and others so there must be something to it.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have my own Emby server and I would love to have a dumb TV instead of my current one. Problem is its 4K screen has absolutely SPOILED me and I don’t wanna go back. And I’ve heard it’s difficult to find a 4K dumb TV.

        Also, and most importantly, I’m the kind of person who uses something until it won’t work anymore. The way I see it is “My TV is currently 6 years old and yet still working fine so why would I buy another when I don’t need one.” (Why generate unnecessary waste?) So, I’m waiting until it dies to get another.

        • thayer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Our Smart TV is offline 99% of the time, so I rarely see the smart features. We’ll sometimes have company stay over and they’ll connect the Ethernet to use the built-in streaming apps with their own credentials, so it’s a nice option to have and it doesn’t impact us otherwise.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I honestly don’t know why you wouldn’t just do jellyfin, unless you’re limited by your hardware and kodi somehow has less overhead?

        They’re both free I guess. You can try them on and see how well they serve tour use case

        • thayer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          JF’s UI hasn’t really done it for me for whatever reason…I have it running in an LXC already and mostly use it at my workstations.

    • Infynis@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s what I’ve done. It’s the way to go. Got a TV from the panel manufacturer that’s so basic you can see light shining through the back when it’s on lol

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s what I did a couple months ago and I regret not doing it sooner. I got a Beelink SER and loaded it with Endeavour OS, a web browser, torrent client, and VLC.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve tried to do this a few times, and unfortunately it feels like you really have to go all in on managing your own content library.

      Like many, I had stopped pirating shit when netflix etc were “good”.

      None of the streaming services want you to use them outside of their official sites/apps, so you end up being limited to like 720p when running them through kodi etc.

      • CronyAkatsuki@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I never touched streaming services, mostly cause they came to my country 2years ago and were already shit they are now, plus cost me too much to even afford one.

        So I just have torrenting setup automated with arr software. ( Don’t even need a vpn because my country has no copyright laws so free to torrent whatever I wan’t )

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you find torrenting to be distasteful, you can get a cheap USB DVD reader and rip dvds instead.

        It’s still technically considered infringement, but at least it’s completely private.

        • Chiro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Any recommendations for easily ripping DVDs? I have hundreds that I need to digitize, and drives that need to be filled.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      that’s basically what i had. a cheap laptop for a ‘streaming device’ and media player with a k400 keyboard with trackpad. connected to a monitor to start, then a cheap tv. don’t have a ‘media server’ though, just a pile of hard drives (externals, or internals with usb adapter or ‘dock’).

      the tv eventually did get hooked up to wifi but i only use it for a couple ‘free’ apps that require no signin and work through pihole ok. mostly the ‘tv’ is playing a random playlist.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t even need to mini pc, we use one of the silverstone amp-sized cases with an asrock

      Also we don’t jellyfin we just use vlc on a win7 base. Means i can run retroarch and UT on the tv as well :)