… and I can’t even continue the chat from my phone.

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your phone has bigger problems if it cannot take 170mb apps, this isn’t the 1990s

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a very bad way to look at things. Just because I have gigabytes of memory doesn’t mean I want to use unoptimized software.

        • baatliwala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          And your way to look at things that “all apps must be 20 mb or less otherwise they are unoptimised” is better because?

          • rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Because optimized software is better for industry, people, and environment. Also seeing that some menu or window is not an html page but a native element makes my headache go away because I value my CPU cycles (seeing a cursor doesn’t lag when some complex page is displayed should not be considered a weird fetish) and like it when things don’t do stupid unnecessary stuff both visually and under the hood.

            And it could be even less than that depending on specifics.

      • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If developers optimized their apps, we could have phones that are 10x faster than 10 yeara ago. Instead they are the same speed and the same amount of apps fit in the bigger storage, because developers are lazy and use heavy, unoptimized technologies that use 10x the resources