• Terrasque@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, I totally agree with you. But that also kinda ignores all the useful things a dog can be trained to do.

    • RustyNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh I’m not talking that it can’t be trained well. That’s not my point.

      Of course dogs can be trained to sniff drugs or find people, the gist of it is that they were trained for this behaviour, and might not understand it like we do.

      A good exemple is a study that research on cancer sniffing dogs had problems with false positives.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The false positive problem actually works in favour of the dogs, here: Their noses are excellent they know exactly whether there’s drugs there or not. They also know that the humans can’t tell so it’s easy to get a treat regardless. And they also know to not overdo it.

        Even more complicated are cats, figures that they are by and large uninterested in being studied or proving anything to you.