• CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have 3 cats. I don’t understand how my wife’s best friend does it with the amount of pets they have. They have 2 ferrets, 2 cats, and 4 dogs.

    • Freeman@lemmy.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      For us it’s feet

      Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge.

      It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.

      • kenbw2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see a couple of flaws

        1. Nobody who lives alone is allowed a pet
        2. If you have a toddler, in this rule that enables you to expand the number of pets, but I’d say a toddler adds to rather than eases the load
      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re at a tie right now then. 4 people and 3 cats. The theory seems to have a giant loophole for snakes and fish though.

        • Freeman@lemmy.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          More a loophole or feature. Fish are easy to take care of same with snakes. You can feed em and head out of town without worry etc.

          Bird has two legs.

          It’s not an actual rule we every invented and then followed. But more, one we ended up realizing waaaay after the fact.

        • Freeman@lemmy.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a divide by zero issue. Snakes and fish don’t count against quota.