Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up11.87Karrow-down1136file-text
arrow-up11.73Karrow-down1imageI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzOha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square155fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·1 year agoI get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
minus-squareInstigate@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year ago I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it. I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance. Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWell somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDid you mean “this” stance, maybe?
minus-squaretrashcan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI suppose that would also have worked, but no.
I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
I mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
Well somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him
Did you mean “this” stance, maybe?
I suppose that would also have worked, but no.