cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/15970074

Valve:

  • popularized DRM on PC
  • killed the used games market on PC
  • bans people for selling their Steam account
  • contributed to popularizing microtransactions, loot boxes and Battle Pass
  • forces you to run a proprietary app to play your games
  • forces updates on you
  • pretends they invented Wine
  • ships devices with a proprietary SteamOS
  • forces devs to use proprietary libraries to use Steam’s features

Gamers:
Yes uncle Gaben more of that please!!!

  • 087008001234@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think the limitations of my first post are pretty much the limitations of what I’ve come to think about these big tech corporations. I agree with your basic premise but it will take me more time in my journey until I can totally get to grips with the full argument. :) My pause is primarily on how Windows is itself an “unethical” product and how that affects other people and corporations other than Microsoft (sure it is an unethical arrangement, but I need to do work before I can make that argument myself).

    e: for coherency

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Windows and other proprietary software is unethical, because it gives developers power over users. People can’t easily see what such software does on their device and they can’t change it. So they can’t control those programs and as a result they have no control over their own devices. It’s also very easy for developers to abuse those users with spyware, DRM and other malicious features. In case of Windows we know for a fact that it does those things. But even if it didn’t, people deserve to be able to control their computers, so it’s unethical to take that right away from them.

      Free software gives you the 4 essential freedoms. Any programmer in the world can audit what such program does and change it. So it’s very hard for a developer to abuse their users. If they add some malicious feature, any programmer can remove it and share the modified version with others. So with free software, it’s the users who are in control (as long as there is at least one programmer among them that can make the changes they want).

      https://piped.video/watch?v=Ag1AKIl_2GM