Whelp, here we go again

  • daveyeah@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mmmm, gotta love that enshittification strategy every big tech company is working on right now.

  • liminis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another executive-driven decision by people who clearly don’t use their own product (kinda impressive really when it’s YT).

    I can’t help wonder if they saw an uptick in adblocking as a result of their absurd increases in ad-time recently and somehow thought this was a reasonable solution.

        • Stewie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its not that hard to fathom when you have worked with these types of people.

          All it was was a numbers meeting, no User Experience folks in the room. They said how much revenue they would increase quarter over quarter, and how much engagement it would drive. Everyone claps, the meeting ends they move forward with the next terrible design decision. Companies no longer take focus group testing seriously for anything.

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Focus groups and qualitative data are so last season. It’s all Business “Intelligence” -driven bullshit nominally based on poorly defined and even more poorly understood metrics (excuse me, “KPIs”)

    • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I rarely use YouTube, but my nephew (he’s two) was over the other day and we put on some cartoons for him that were in YouTube since my wife and I don’t have Disney plus. I couldn’t BELIEVE how many ads it showed. One five-minute merry melodies cartoon had FOUR SEPARATE ad breaks, the third and fourth of which were both 3+ minutes long if you weren’t paying attention to skip.

      Wtf?! Not even shit ass normal broadcast television has that many commercials.

      • liminis@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Feels like every year corporations rely on the naivety of youth in an attempt to push more and more egregious shit.

        • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly right they’re normalizing ads in everything. They’re indoctrinating the youth, who don’t know any better or differently, into just accepting/expecting that all content in all forms comes with ads, and you can’t watch any of it without signing in so they can track you and sell your data.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    And what are the consequences of “strikes”? Will you delete my Google account, including my email, and also screw up my Android phone and my kids Chromebook?

    It’s scary to realize that Google has me by the balls here. They can screw me in so many ways, and screw my family members as well. I’d rather have my bank credentials stolen than my email credentials, at least I can get real customer service from the bank, I can even go to a physical location and speak face-to-face with someone who can help me. Google wont give me customer support, and my email account is the closest thing to an identity I have for most businesses I interact with.

    It takes a lot of work to avoid Google. Yes, there are alternatives, but in D&D terms, avoiding Google is like a -2 to all stats for your entire life, and not something we can expect the general population to do.

    All this shows the need for anti-trust enforcement. The same company is controlling too much. Bust 'em up!

    • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moral of the story: create separate account for YouTube that has no high value services or data on it.

      • Chahk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen enough horror stories to know that’s not going to help. They can, and do, associate multiple accounts to same users. Be it by cookies, IP addresses, or dark magic, the end result is the same - they can upend your entire digital life if they want to. r/degoogle better hurry up and migrate to Lemmy.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue the bigger moral is that you should always own your online identity. You should buy your own domain (@yourname.xyz or something like that) and make your email on that. So if Google bans you, you just switch email providers and keep your address.

        • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been using @fixnum.org and since a few years the alias @wim.land to do exactly this, but that’s just email.

          My app purchases, photo storage, and YouTube account are all entangled in this. I could decouple from Google, but it would be very painful.

    • GravityAce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spend a weekend degoogling your stuff. There are alternatives for everything now. No regrets

    • jon@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article suggests you simply get blocked from watching additional videos. But there’s no info on how that works- is it account based? IP based? Can I wipe my YouTube cookies to bypass a block?

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be the logical thing for them to do. All it takes is a couple of folks taking it in the neck from them to make the rest fall in line.

    • somniumx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the reason I’m hesitant to use a VPN for yt Premium from a cheap country. The lingering thought of losing my Gmail and android access…

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently found this gem: https://adnauseam.io/

    It’s an ad blocker that only hides ads and clicks them for you in the background, which means you waste advertiser’s money, support creators, can’t get flagged for ad blocking as easily, and they can’t build a proper profile against your ad activity since it’s all noise. Haven’t installed it yet, but this might be the push I needed.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This might be an acceptable sollution, but what happens on the other side of the ad? If something maliciously is being spreaded, the click might have to happen in an isolated form from the rest of the system or the browser.

      • evilgiraffe666@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I cannot vouch for it, but this is their explanation: https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#does-adnauseams-clicking-put-me-at-risk-for-malicious-ads-or-ransomware

        Does AdNauseam’s clicking put me at risk for malicious Ads or ransomware?

        Absolutely not. AdNauseam simulates clicks on Ads by issuing an AJAX request to the adserver in a background process. This request is made without opening any additional windows or pages on your computer. The text-only request is safely discarded by AdNauseam before it has a chance to execute in the browser (no DOM is constructed and no code is ever allowed to run). Further, all cookies from AdNauseam’s visits are automatically blocked before they reach the browser’s local storage.

    • stallmer@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interest rates hikes stopped the free money, so companies need profit.

      I’d argue they don’t need $500 million when they already make $400 million, but I’m just a lowly peasant.

      tl;dr: capitalism

      • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially with video. Reddit was easy-ish to leave – I haven’t left entirely – since it’s just a link aggregator and glorified forums. That’s nothing new to the Internet. And Twitter was easy to replace with Mastodon.

        But hosting video? That’s a tough one to replicate. I know there are some other platforms out there, but I can’t imagine any could really take on YouTube, due to space and bandwidth considerations.

        So yeah, I think YouTube has us all by the balls. And they know it.

  • that_one_guy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did all these tech companies just get together and decide to fuck us over around the same time? Seriously, what is going on with all these companies rolling out hugely unpopular new rules/changes all on one another’s heels?

    • Mars@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The end of 0% interest means “business” no longer have access to free money. So now they want benefits, and growth but without the spending.

      Also we skipped a tech bubble crash around 2008, so these corpos deaths are more than overdue.

      The cicle as Doctorow says in his enshification tesis is:

      1.- be good to your users, spending tons of that VC and 0% interest loan free money.

      2.- be shit to your users, be good to your clients (add buyers, business that use your platform to do business)

      3.- be shit to everyone. Squeeze the platform and get every last dime of value as profit.

      Once you are in 3 there is no coming back. But these corporations have pulling the ladder behind them using an extra decade of dominant position to try to stop the cicle.

  • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I’d rather pay for Nebula than YouTube premium. Most of the creators I actively follow are on there anyways, and the few that aren’t (usually the ones with very long videos) I should probably just watch with ads anyways to support them.

    • ErgodicTangle@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a similar thought. How fair is nebula to their creators? I heard it was somehow creator owned, but other than that I have no idea how it works.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone in the Fediverse (I don’t know where and who) posted that you have to add the following filters into U-Block Origin. When done you shouldn’t see any anti-adblock-warnings :

    youtube.com##+js(set,yt.config_.openPopupConfig.supportedPopups.adBlockMessageViewModel,false)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.adBlocksFound,O)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,ytplayer.config.aras.raw_player_response.adPlacements,[])
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.hasAllowedlnstreamAd,true)
    

    I might add that I haven’t experienced any anti-adblock-warnings yet, but I added these filters in advance. I might be worth a shot!

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they want me to stop blocking ads, they will need to get rid of ads like this. I get ads like this all the time and it’s completely inappropriate.

    IMG-7171.png

    • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get ads like that too often, but the annoying thing for me is when the ad is 10x louder than the video itself.

      • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was this one add that had a gunshot sound then a really high pitched whistle.

        They might have gotten in trouble as the whistle sound was eventually removed.

  • ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll stop blocked ads when I stop using their service. Not a minute sooner.

      • flop@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does youtube even work with NoScript? I just assumed that google has 50 different scrips running that break the site if they aren’t allowed

  • agitatedpotato@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitch couldn’t beat my adblocking, it just taught me how to find and use custom scripts. Shoot your shot YT, I haven’t installed a script for your website yet but now Im gonna have too. Congrats the number of ads im gonna see from you is about to go down.

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s your Twitch solution? Blocking Twitch is considerably more difficult than YouTube, every solution I’ve found breaks after a month or so. Best I can get is have it display a blank screen while ads play, but I still have to wait it out, which isn’t ideal.

      • agitatedpotato@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        pixeltris on github, a search for pixeltris should get you there first result. Everything you need is on that page, including how to instal the script to ublock, im using the vid swap script and TTLOL pro. It’s not perfect but the ads are gone.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ad blocker detection is not new, and other publishers regularly ask viewers to disable ad blockers

    “everyone else is treating their customers like garbage, so they don’y hold it against us”.

    Yes, we can.

    I didn’t block when you had 5 second ads. I didn’t block when you had 15 second ads. I started blocking when you’d play 2+ unskippable 15 second ads back-to-back. I didn’t mind sitting through an ad when I appreciate the service you offered. Now, you’re just being greedy, and I will go to great lengths to damage your bottom line as notably as I can.

  • pastelsquirrel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    lmao fuck right off Google. there are a million open source alternatives out there that still let me watch videos, nor do I (nor will I) have an account with you clowns.